Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
DAWN - the Internet Edition


October 20, 2001 Saturday Shaba'an 2, 1422
Features


Security steps boost joggers’ confidence
Moenjodaro’s fate hangs in the balance
Arrogance says it all
Bazm is back in business
Truth the immediate casualty



Security steps boost joggers’ confidence


By Shamsul Islam Naz

OPEN SPACES, including graveyards and shrines, had earlier become abodes of petty criminals like purse-snatchers, pickpockets and addicts. Now, due to the security measures taken by police, these places are once again being frequented by joggers and fresh air seekers.

The overwhelming population of the city belongs to the working class which due to financial constraints and other problems is believed to be reluctant to come out in the open for fresh air. The rest of the population and those who are fond of jogging and other healthy activities have given up this practice because of the fear of law-breakers.

Just one incident stirred the senior superintendent of police to action. A newly-wed couple was deprived of valuables by two young men in the Bagh-i-Jinnah recently. It was an eye-opener for the police chief who reacted quickly and comprehensively. He wrote a letter of apology to the couple, who would surely have been surprised by this act of the SSP. He also called a meeting and asked police officers to apprehend the culprits. He made it clear to his subordinates that he would not like to see such an incident again. He ordered that special attention should be paid to the safety and security of public parks and playlands. As a follow-up, police in uniform and plainclothes were deputed in parks and playgrounds, while Elite commandos were deputed in the Bagh-i-Jinnah.

Now public parks and playgrounds no longer give a deserted look; they are no more an abode of pickpockets and drug addicts as they were just a year before. The Lady Bagh near District Council, D-Grounds, Batala Colony Grounds, Kaleem Shaheed Park, Daccan Grounds, Al-Fateh Grounds, Qasmi Park and Golf Club are all being used by people as a source of health in this otherwise congested and polluted city.

Till the early 70s, the total area of open spaces in the city was about 803 acres, out of which 351 acres were covered by parks, both developed and semi-developed. Ninety-eight acres of open spaces were in the use of various educational institutions.

During the pre-partition days, most open spaces were situated in and around the Civil Lines, and their total area was 114.94 acres. The Civil Lines still has two open spaces spread over 45 acres each. Nowhere else in the city, an open space meant for the public has an area of more than 16 acres. There are numerous small open spaces of various sizes covering an area of 86.28 acres in Ghulam Muhammadabad — the largest being above 15 acres and the smallest less than four acres.

People’s Colony has 32 open spaces of varying sizes over 98 acres. There are 20 open spaces in Labour Colony and D-Type Colony, covering a total area of 23.16 acres. The total area allocated for open spaces in these colonies is considerable on the face of it, but it is not enough. The city requires more parks and grounds for games and sports.

Even the educational institutions, including the Agriculture University, have only 76 acres of open spaces which can be used as playgrounds. There is acute shortage of sports grounds for college students. Since the 80s, not a single school or college has been set up with an open space. During the same period, only one park along the Rakh Branch Canal on the Faisalabad-Samundri Road was developed. While the countdown on open spaces is increasing, town planners and civic agencies seem to be unaware of the alarming trend.

The defunct Faisalabad Municipal Corporation established a parks and horticulture cell last year for the maintenance of greenbelts and parks besides development of neglected areas. It is being run by a director, a magistrate, a municipal architect, a deputy director, a garden superintendent, three garden inspectors and 636 mali/beldars. There are a total 157 big and small parks and 34 greenbelts in the city.

A round of the city reveals that almost 90 per cent of the parks, greenbelts have been developed, upgraded and beautified by the tehsil municipal administration with the financial assistance of private companies.

Since lack of open spaces has no direct impact on the economic and social life of a city, the importance of open spaces is usually not appreciated properly. Faisalabad faces a similar situation. Since partition this key aspect of the civil life here has been neglected. In the colonies planned after partition, sufficient attention has not been paid to open spaces.

At present, the city is spread over 52,142 acres with a population of 2,318,433 which is 42 per cent of the district population while the total area of the district is 5,856 square kilometres with a population density of 927 persons per square kilometre as against 515 persons observed during the last census in the district.

According to town planners, with the increasing population and dwindling open spaces in urban localities, there is an urgent need to develop a new town in the city with open spaces and other civic amenities as the citizens have not seen any town developed with full necessities for the last two-and-a-half decades.

Top



Moenjodaro’s fate hangs in the balance


By M.B. Kalhoro

MOENJODARO’s fate hangs in the balance with the collapse of the Authority for the Preservation of Moenjodaro on Sept 30, 1997. Justice Abdul Qadir Sheikh headed it at the time. Infighting between the Department of Archaeology and other organizations had resulted in neglect of the actual task of preserving the site.

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto had created a body with wide-ranging operations, which later evolved into the Authority for the Preservation of Moenjodaro (APM) on June 4, 1974.

The Moenjodaro site is spread over an area of three million square metres. Barely 10 per cent of it has been excavated. Under the Master plan, the APM utilized $23,500. Its main task was to control the River Indus and develop the site for tourism. Foreign assistance and know-how was sought.

Through seminars and workshops, it was decided to construct seven spurs on the right bank of the River Indus and dig a circular drain around the site to prevent waterlogging and salinity which had damaged the site.

After the death of Z.A. Bhutto, the site was again neglected by the senior officials of the Archaeology Department. Only five spurs were constructed. The meagre allocations reflected the department’s apathy. Differences between the men-in-charge aggravated the situation.

Millions of rupees were spent on implementing the proposal of a German, Michael Jansen, to dig a circular drain around Moenjodaro and set up a pumping station to drain away water into the Dadu Canal. The two inauguration ceremonies of the station by dignitaries speaks of the seriousness of the officials.

The exercise proved a failure when seepage started inside the structures of the site and damaged them, burdening the APM with huge power bills of Rs10 million per annum. The drain developed cracks. Tubewells installed around the site were closed and the drain dried up. Big electric motors were either stolen or found to be defective. The entire project of constructing a circular drain and tubewells is now dead along with the main pumping station, whose huge motors have become rusted.

The Japan Fund and United Nations Development Fund next stepped in to extend funds to carry out preservation and conservation work at Moenjodaro to save it from the imminent danger of waterlogging and salinity.

The Moenjodaro Conservation Cell (MCC) as a subsidiary of the UNDP was established, with a staff of 67, in 1992 at Moenjodaro. Syed Hakim Shah Bokhari was its director. A huge staff — which included engineers, supervisors, and site attendants — was appointed and trained by British, German, Japanese, and American engineers. Some of the engineers were sent abroad for essential training.

Differences again erupted between the MCC and the Department of Archaeology when both agencies clashed over as to who was authorized to carry out the excavation work at the site.

Without any guidance, the project and site remained in a dismal condition except during the brief period of Larkana commissioner Nazar Hussain Mahat. With his efforts, the National Fund for Moenjodaro (NFM) was activated although differences with the Department of Archaeology remained. Funds were raised locally. Besides, with the technical support of the NFM and with the constitution of a new body some work was achieved. The dried up lawns turned green, potable water was supplied, the closed canteen was reopened, and an international phone facility was installed.

However, when Mr Mahat was transferred from Larkana, these facilities started to deteriorate.

The Department of Archaeology from the time of its formation had already begun to place hurdles in the NFM’s path. Dr Kaleem Lashari, secretary of the execution work at Moenjodaro, tried to quell the tension. However, the secretary of the NFM phoned the site director on Sept 24 ordering him to cease all activities.

The preservation of the ailing world heritage site was halted on the orders of the secretary, Culture and Tourism, Sindh, who told the project director of the NFM, Mohan Lal, and around 39 of its employees to leave.

The project had been formed only a few months back.

Top



Arrogance says it all


THE mayor of New York, Rudolph (Rudy) Guiliani, was shaking with anger while returning the $10 million donation given by Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia for the victims of World Trade Center. “We are not going to accept the cheque — period”, said the mayor’s aide.

What rattled the great Mayor of NY was that the prince — sixth wealthiest entrepreneur of the world as per Forbes listing with a personal fortune of $20.3 billion — dared to question the correctness of the foreign policy of mighty America towards Middle East, and with special reference to the Palestine issue.

Adding insult to injury, the prince had the audacity to then ask for the revision of policies. “It is time the US was “fair” with the Arabs, chiefly, with regard to the Palestinian cause”, the prince told the NY gathering.

It was indeed too much to ask of a nation, who had recently encountered the worse act of terrorism ever carried out anywhere in the world. But this is not the first time that the US policy has come under fire, particularly after the attacks on WTC and the Pentagon.

Since the tragedy, there has been a constant diatribe from all schools of thought against the lop-sided, unjust and hypocritical nature of the US policy towards Muslim countries.

It is exactly this brand of arrogance, conceit and double standard of the US government that has cost them so ‘dearly’ — more than 7,000 American lives, besides the colossal economic loss. But more than that is the heavy cost of living under constant fear. The fear of death can play havoc with the mental health of an individual; imagine a whole nation living in fear of imminent death.

Today, the war is on. The US-led coalition is raining both missiles and food on the innocent Afghans for “enduring peace”. To build a world free of “fear” for the future generations, aims are undoubtedly noble enough to claim support.

The world, as we witness today, is in dire need of peace, stability and development. The advent of the new century saw the old wars continuing, with new ones on the brink of breaking out. Palestine, Kashmir, Bosnia, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, and many more skirmishes and insurgencies within the countries are few a few examples to quote.

The goal of every war has been and is to bring peace. But peace, even today, appears to be like the forbidden fruit that humans will perhaps never relish. It is not that peace cannot be achieved, but the fact is people who actually run the world have their own axes to grind and no goodwill at heart, so peace remains an elusive goal.

The game of peace demands not arrogance, but understanding, tolerance, justice, fair play and perhaps some degree of modesty. The US call for help to Pakistan in its fight against terrorism was less of a request and more of an arrogant demand — you are either with us or against us — leaving no option for the poor (in every meaning of the word) country but to say yes.

It is not only the American people, who are paying for this arrogance. We in Pakistan are living in no secure environment. Every day protest rallies are held and the extremist religious groups calling for Jihad give strike calls. Several innocent lives, including those of children, have been lost during these protests. Every day activity of children going to school worries parents because of bomb scares in schools. The business is at its lowest and markets empty.

No doubt, the US will make amends. Some concessions have already been given, such as lifting of sanctions and rescheduling of debts, and perhaps more are in the offing. But will this bring back the people who died for America’s enduring peace in Pakistan. Will their dear ones be compensated? — there is little likelihood.

Saudi Arabia is one of the closest allies of the US in the Arab and Muslim world. It was among the first to condemn the terrorist acts, willing to extend whatever support possible, and even cancelled the citizenship of Osama bin Laden. In addition to this, Saudis have billions of dollars invested in the US itself. Prince Al-Waleed, who is considered a serious investor, has more than $12 billion invested in major US companies, including Citigroup, AOL Time Warner and Apple Computers. If this is how the US treats Saudi Arabia, one can only imagine the consequences, if Pakistan had dared to say NO.

One thing that needs to be repeatedly made known to the US government is that the alleged villain of September 11 tragedy, Osama and his, now most ostracized supporters, Taliban, are Frankensteins, made by America itself. And this is not the first time that their own, Fankensteins have come to haunt them. Aimal Kansi, who is now on death row in the US for killing three CIA men, was also a product of CIA, used during the Afghan war against the Soviet Union.

America will have to step down from the pedestal of arrogance and actually review and revise not only its foreign policy, but also its attitude towards other nations. International politics is a game of balancing power and interdependence. No country, no matter how powerful, can survive without co-existing with another. The question that co-existence can be peaceful or conflict ridden, depends on the policies formulated by each nation.

The US has witnessed and its people have suffered a great human tragedy. There are not enough words to condemn the horrible act. At the same time, one cannot ignore the atrocities perpetrated on the Palestinians since the end of Second World War. Thousands have died and are dying. This is just one example, there are many more. By terming this war as a war between Muslims and Christians, or between the Western world and the Muslim world, or for enduring peace, will gain nothing. The ground reality remains that human beings are being sacrificed at the altar of might, arrogance and egoism. These are not what a country waging war for peace should manifest in its foreign policy or in its conduct.—By Fazila Gulrez

Top



Bazm is back in business


By Ashfaque Naqvi

IT was Saira Hashmi’s baby and she had been nurturing it for a good 12 years. But then her vocal chords somehow refused to cooperate preventing her from calling out to her baby. But earlier this month when Dr Agha Sohail picked up courage and gave it a loving nod, it came scampering. As a consequence there was a large gathering of the Bazm-i-Hamnafsaan at Agha Suhail’s residence last weekend. And the best part of it was that Saira Hashmi was also seen there after an absence of almost a year.

Among others present I noticed the psychologist, Dr Attiya Syed, the chief editor of the monthly Adab-i-Latif, Siddiqa Begum, another editor, Shaista Hasan, who produces the Shohar-i-Namdar, and a host of poets including Karamat Bokhari, Murtaza Barlas, Shahid Wasti, Dr Khurshid Rizvi and Aslam Kamal.

It was also niced to see Maimoona Ansari attending the session after a long absence. The programme was conducted by the artist and haiko poet, Sheba Taraz, whose mother, the well known writer, novelist and editor of the monthly Tajdeed-i-Nau, Azra Asghar, was also there having come down from Islamabad. Others from outside Lahore were the two stalwarts of Vehari who are producing the quarterly Adab-i-Aaliya and offering it, or trying to offer it, at 250 rupees per copy.

The programme started with veteran writer Syed Qasim Mahmood presenting a short story, Mera Aklota Beita. It was not only well written but also swell delivered. It received deserved applause. After him, Prof Abdul Karim Khalid read a paper on modern Urdu short story. But that was not the end of it. Immediately after him, a young lecturer started delivering a memorized lecture on the same subject. He had no eye contact with the audience and kept mumbling to himself in monotones. After him, I saw another young man fidgeting in his seat ready to utter his words of wisdom. At the same time Sheba Taraz announced that there would also be a muzakira or discussion after that. And since I know how greatly people are in love with their own voice, I feared the sitting would end up around midnight, especially with so many poets around who would also ask for their pound of flesh. I had no option but to come away but happy, all the same, that the Bazam-i-Hamnafsaan had been revived.

* * * * * *


WHEN Mustansar Husain Tarar, a very dear friend, presented me with a book of his newspaper columns, the earlier ones, I wrote that they were of no permanent value and hence did not deserve to be published in book form. Now AG Josh has also been a friend and has been sending me his monthly Adab Dost regularly, evidently to evoke some comments. But what can I write after seeing the October issue of that magazine? Does he want me to say that it is one of the best literary journals ever produced? My word — whatever literature there is in it has been totally overshadowed by the numerous, and meaningless, pictures in it of all and sundry crowding around his portly figure. It is the height of self-aggrandisement and self-projection, something which I detest and consider most unethical. I have been a PRO in the PAF for quite some time and it was part of my duty to release pictures for publication in the press. Since I had to be at every function because of my duty, I would appear in almost every picture taken on the occasion. But never once did I release a picture in which I had appeared prominently. If some such picture seemed essential for the press, I would make sure to edit myself out of it. AG Josh should know that it is a self-defeating exercise he is indulging in and is counter-productive.

* * * * * *


IT was the same old assembly of poets last week at the second-Monday-of-the-month sitting of the Adab Serai with Karamat Bokhari putting in an odd appearance. After the usual brief reviews of recent publications by Shahnaz Muzzammil which included Ameen Ludhianvi’s poetic collection, Pas-i-Fikr, Faisal Hanif’s Bey-khayali, Mehshar Zaidi’s Umr Faisal, Shagufta Nazli’s collection of mini-stories in Punjabi titled Roop Saroop, and Shamim Almas’s Muhabbat Azab, the normal round of poetry got under way. Munfa’at Abbas Rizvi was appealing. Said he:

Geet milan kay gatay gatay

Hont raseeley ho jatay hein

Rizvi ki ghazlon mein aa kar

Lafz nasheeley ho jatay hein

And Karamat Bokhari came up with:

Aaina heh maslihat say beyniaz

Aainey say jhoot bulwaey ga kaun

Aql ki ayyarian apni jagah

Par junun kay samney aaye ga kaun

Shahnaz Muzzammil lodged a direct complaint:

Mujrim hun to jurm bata kiun nahi daitay

Munsif ho to insaaf dila kiun nahin daitay


* * * * * *


OF late I have been noticing an upsurge in the projection of the Punjabi language. Even those whose bread and butter depends upon Urdu are vociferous in this respect and are insisting upon the Punjabis to use their maan-boli, or mother tongue, even in their writings. So far so good. But the Punjabi I read these days in books is not that which my maan or mother would understand. Granted that I belong to the previous generation and my mother to an even earlier one, but even mothers of the present generation would not be able to make head or tail of the written Punjabi unless they are well educated.

I have seen some fantastic sentences in the Punjabi books appearing today: Uhnun qalamband karan tay mamur keeta-nao-banao tareeqay — insani jabillat vich khwahish da ansar, etc. Now how many Punjabi mothers of today understand all this? I have seen a book which on the one hand calls it a kahanian da parages and constructs sentences laced with high class Urdu on the other. How can this be justified? I am a firm believer in the purity of a language — every language.

Top



Truth the immediate casualty


IT seems that CNN, BBC, Fox News, ABC, CBS or NBC don’t really care too much about how many people have died in the air raids on Afghanistan. Every passing day brings a rise in the civilian death toll as claimed by the Taliban regime. However, all such claims are automatically qualified by the correspondents or news anchors of these channels with the following remark: “These claims cannot be independently confirmed.”

Gen Richard Myers, America’s chairman of joint chiefs of staff, and his boss, Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, give daily briefings at the Pentagon and audience in Pakistan can watch them every evening. In the past 10 days though, there has hardly been a change in the policy of not really talking about “collateral damage” (it seems they don’t have the guts to tell it like it is, that is, the deaths of innocent people who had absolutely nothing to do with the Sept 11 attacks). What is sometimes even more unfortunate is that most reporters covering these press conferences seem to be taking everything they are told at face value. For example, the US government keeps saying that the civilian death toll in Afghanistan cannot be independently confirmed but major news organizations in America do not seem to question this claim. Clearly, if America has spy satellites that are so developed that they could pick up a vehicle on the ground from miles up in the sky they could surely detect human bodies. The other point that needs to be made here has to do with bias. American authorities say that the claims cannot be independently confirmed. However, consider the opposite. What if America was under aerial attack and what if a lot of “collateral damage” was inflicted on it? It would then cry hoarse, just as the Afghans (and people in several countries around the world) are doing. In such a situation then, would CNN or the BBC dispute American claims of such deaths? Quite unlikely.

America probably knows, and with good reason, that the one thing that might turn public opinion, even at home, against the bombings might be reports of civilian deaths. Hence the tight control on flow of information. In any case, some would say that the anthrax scare — unfortunate as it may be — seems to be providing a rather convenient diversionary topic on major American and Western networks taking public attention away from what might be happening as a result of the deaths in Afghanistan.

It’s sad that the people dying in Afghanistan have no one to speak for them. The Taliban said around 200 people died in a village on the outskirts of Jalalabad. The US ridiculed these claims saying the usual: the deaths, if any, are regrettable but they cannot be “independently confirmed,” and that the operation is not against the Afghan people. Western journalists—the closest you could get to independent observes in this context — said that at least 18 freshly dug graves were found in this village. Perhaps the Afghans were exaggerating, after all, but is 18 deaths too little?

Surely, BBC and CNN will not be showing live one-on-one interviews of the loved ones of those killed, asking them to describe in detail how they felt as the planes came overhead, and dropped their bombs. No candle light vigils will be held or shown for these people, and no memorial services or interviews with witnesses who could describe what happened and tell audience of the pain and agony of those left behind.

Unfortunately, channels like the BBC or CNN cannot be divorced from the societies that they live in. The thinking that shapes the collective ethos of communities in Europe or North America will to a great extent affect the people who run the BBC or CNN. Perhaps, this means that there will be a subconscious bias against people from cultures with whom those from the host or dominant culture cannot relate. After all, having a candle light vigil or a memorial service is not the norm in Afghanistan or in much of the Muslim world. But that doesn’t in any way mean that families of victims of bombings in the latter case share a pain and sense of loss that is in any way less than that experienced by survivors of the Sept 11 attacks. Truth, as Peter Preston writing in The Guardianrecently said, is bound to be the immediate casualty in wars like these. — OMAR R. QURESHI

Top



Top of Page





Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005