Time to stop using heated rhetoric

Published October 7, 2001

LOS ANGELES: Although tough talk from the president may seem reassuring, the Bush administration’s confrontational posture is likely to exacerbate the threat of terrorist attacks.

The diplomatic ultimatum - “either you are with us or you are with the terrorists” - is alienating existing and potential allies, and feeding into resentment of American unilateralism.

Since the bombing of Iraq in 1998 and the Kosovo war, Europeans have complained about the United States’ cowboy diplomacy - with the French inventing the term ‘hyperpower” to describe America’s disquieting role in the world. In the Mideast, resentment of US policy has grown steadily since the Gulf War.

Despite the Defence Department’s dumping of the name ‘Infinite Justice” and Bush’s apology for use of the term ‘crusade,” there is an air of Christian fundamentalism in the enterprise. This makes life even harder for governments in the Islamic world - already caught in a difficult position between increasingly militant populations with substantive grievances against US policy and the US steamroller on the other.

Bush’s declaration that the US will target not only Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network but all terrorist organizations of ‘global reach,’ their ‘support networks,’ the Taliban - and all others who do not submit to US demands - is already creating new enemies. If large-scale military operations start and civilians are killed, those enemies will multiply tenfold.

Meanwhile there is talk about ‘freeing’ the CIA to do more ‘human intelligence’ work, which seems to forget that Osama and other Afghan extremists are products of CIA operations in Afghanistan in the 1980s to thwart the Soviet occupation there.

Instead, the US must say to other countries, “We will work with you to find out who is guilty. We will reconsider controversial policies of ours and submit them to the judgment of international bodies. But you must help us to find these people who want to kill American civilians.”

The ‘war on terrorism’ the Bush administration plans to wage will increase the chances of reprisal attacks against the US. A criminal investigation, with genuine international cooperation, would dramatically decrease the threat, especially if accompanied by a change in overall US foreign policy. —Dawn/LAT-WP News Service (c) Newsday.

Opinion

Editorial

Centre vs provinces
Updated 10 Jun, 2026

Centre vs provinces

The reason the centre finds itself in this position is rooted in its failure to expand the tax net and boost revenues.
Party in crisis
10 Jun, 2026

Party in crisis

THE young KP chief minister must be starting to realise just how thorny a seat he occupies. There has been a flurry...
Varsity woes
10 Jun, 2026

Varsity woes

FINANCIAL crises affecting public sector universities across Pakistan are now having an impact on academic...
Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....