Lawyers question judges’ appointment process

Published Updated

• Action Committee describes method as ‘horse trading’
• Ali Ahmed Kurd to lead countrywide movement

ISLAMABAD: The Lawyers Action Committee (LAC) on Saturday rejected the Judicial Commission of Pakistan’s (JCP) process for appointing judges to the country’s high courts, describing it as “horse trading” and a “horrific” appointment process.

“While the adverse fallout of the 26th and 27th constitutional amendments continues to wreak havoc on Pakistan’s justice system, the current process of appointing judges to the high courts is particularly horrific,” the committee said in a resolution adopted at its meeting in Islamabad.

The committee also nominated veteran lawyer and former Supreme Court Bar Association president Ali Ahmed Kurd to lead a movement it plans to launch on a range of issues confronting the country.

“I have accepted the leadership of the movement with a heavy heart at the insistence of my colleagues, particularly because the people of the country have lost faith in the justice system,” Kurd told reporters at the Supreme Court.

The resolution urged JCP members who “still possess a conscience” to refrain from participating in a “horse-trading exercise” and to speak out against the “farce”.

It regretted that appointments to the high courts had become akin to nominations to the Senate, alleging that they were either granted as rewards for political loyalty or secured through financial influence.

“When high court judges obtain their positions not on the basis of competence or integrity, but through their ability to manoeuvre among different groups and political parties within the Judicial Commission of Pakistan, the future of justice in Pakistan is surely doomed,” the resolution said.

It also described the interview process as a “mockery”, alleging that interviews were being held in camera while several JCP members had been excluded from the interview committee, allowing “blatantly unqualified candidates” to be selected.

The committee also expressed concern over the deteriorating security situation in Balochistan and the loss of dozens of lives in frequent terrorist attacks.

The resolution added that the pursuit of a “hard state” had alienated large sections of the population in these regions, resulted in the loss of lives and security, and fuelled long-standing resentment that was being exploited by others.

The committee called for the constitution of a fact-finding commission for troubled regions to identify their issues and grievances and hold public consultations on possible solutions.

Dissenting voices

The resolution alleged that the continued incarceration of lawyers Imaan Mazari and Hadi Ali Chattha, along with political figures including former premier Imran Khan, Dr Yasmin Rashid, Mahrang Baloch and Ali Wazir, reflected a lack of ideas for dealing with dissenting voices. It also criticised the silence and “complicity” of the judiciary, the legal fraternity and political parties in the face of “blatant injustice”.

It said the prevailing situation was “entirely unsustainable” and was leading the nation towards an irreversible catastrophe that no amount of posturing on the world stage could disguise.

The resolution said the LAC voiced its support for the ongoing sit-in at Babarlo, in Sindh, over the disappearance of Priya Kumari and others, and called on the Sindh government to respect minority rights and address their legitimate grievances.

Bar elections

The resolution condemned persistent attempts by the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) and provincial bar councils to allegedly obstruct and rig bar association elections where they feared an unfavourable outcome. It demanded that all bar elections be held on time in accordance with the law and with Nadra verification.

It demanded that purported advocates with fake degrees or those holding other jobs be removed from the rolls, and that a complete ban be imposed on voting by individuals holding dual memberships in different bar associations.

Published in Dawn, July 19th, 2026