The army oath

THIS is with reference to Dr Mervyn Husain’s excellent letter on the subject of the army oath (Nov 11). If the arguments put forward by Aslam Beg that he took the oath of allegiance according to the Indian Army Act 1911 are to be accepted, then we are also to assume that in accordance with his interpretation, even after the creation of Pakistan in 1947, he perhaps still owes his loyalty to the British crown, though he had been paid salaries and perks by taxpayers of this country.

What Aslam Beg forgets is that he took the oath on the 1973 Constitution when he assumed command of our army after Zia’s death.

This offensive defence argument exposes the sickening mindset of men like Aslam Beg who have forgotten that unlike the British Indian Army, which was raised to help the colonial Raj in a colony, the Pakistan army belongs to a sovereign state and is there to serve the people of this nation, who are sole masters of their destiny, and all citizens, including paid civil and uniformed servants, have sworn allegiance to uphold the constitution and pledged to work within the confines of law. I say let ‘Heavens fall, but justice be done’ by the Supreme Court, which is the sole competent authority to interpret our constitution and give judgments that are binding on all.


Do you have information you wish to share with You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Terrorism: car number plates

FIFTEEN years ago, the government conducted a major research on car registration. They found out that to stop ...

Sit-ins: another view

THIS refers to the letter ‘Are sit-ins democratic?’ (Jan 29). Prof Sharif Al Mujahid has made a strong case that...

GB: recruitment

CORRUPTION in any form ruins the very roots of any institution. But corruption in the education sector destroys...

Comments (7) Closed

Nov 15, 2012 04:35am
"the Pakistan army belongs to a sovereign state and is there to serve the people of this nation, who are sole masters of their destiny", well said.
Nov 15, 2012 02:26pm
mohammad shafiq
Nov 15, 2012 02:14pm
aslam beg owes more than an apology, hemust be tried for high treason and punished appropriately
Mahmood Minhas
Nov 15, 2012 02:48pm
The writer has commented very true under the present circumstances and the accused should be brave to accept andseek apology in the interest of the nation from the people of Pakistan.If the people fogive the God will forgive.
Nov 15, 2012 04:04am
Gen Beg should calm down and stop making statements.He has enough to live a comfortable life. There is no harm in seeking apology from people, when God forgives us people will be too glad to excuse him.
Nov 15, 2012 11:56pm
?the Pakistan army .... is there to serve the people of this nation, who are sole masters of their destiny? I know this, you know this but does the Pakistani army know this? :)
Cyrus Howell
Nov 16, 2012 12:23am
How is it possible to obey the Constitution when it changes week by week?