LAHORE, Aug 30: The chief justice of Lahore High Court has constituted a five-judge larger bench to hear a contempt of court petition against President Asif Ali Zardari for not relinquishing the political office of PPP co-chairman.

Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial will head the bench with Justice Nasir Saeed Sheikh, Justice Sheikh Najamul Hasan, Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah as members. The hearing will begin on Sept 5.

Advocate Muhammad Azhar Siddique, chairman of the Judicial Activism Panel, had filed the petition against the president for continuing to hold a political office and indulge in political activities in violation of an order of an LHC full bench.

The petitioner said the president had neither dissociated himself from the political office in accordance with the court’s order against his dual office nor stopped ‘misusing’ the Presidency. He said the use of the Presidency for partisan political activities was not only illegal but also contempt of the court’s orders issued on May 12 last year.

He prayed that a show-cause notice should be issued to the president and he should be punished under the Contempt of Court Ordinance of 2003 read with Article 204 of the Constitution.

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

RAFAH, the last shelter for Gaza’s hapless people, is about to face the wrath of the Israeli war machine. There ...
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.