UN body moves Indian Supreme Court against contentious citizenship law

Published
112
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet. — AFP/File
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet. — AFP/File

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet has filed an intervention application in the Indian Supreme Court against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the Indian Ministry for External Affairs said on Tuesday.

The petition by the United Nations came amid ongoing protests in India against the CAA — which was enacted in December last year. The protests took a turn for the worst last week in Delhi, where over 40 people were killed in communal violence in various parts of the city.

“Our Permanent Mission in Geneva was informed yesterday evening by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights that her office had filed an Intervention Application in the Supreme Court of India in respect to CAA,” India's External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Raveesh Kumar said in a four-point statement.

In his response to the application, Kumar said the citizenship law is an internal matter of India "and concerns the sovereign right of the Indian Parliament to make laws".

He further said that the Indian government "strongly believes" that no foreign party has the capacity to call for an action on issues pertaining to India's sovereignty.

He further said that the CAA meets all requirements of India's constitution and thus is constitutionally valid. “It is reflective of our long-standing national commitment in respect of human rights issues arising from the tragedy of the Partition of India,” he said.

“India is a democratic country governed by the rule of law," the spokesperson said while adding that the country has "utmost respect for and full trust in our independent judiciary".

He said that the government is confident that their "sound and legally sustainable" position will be proved right by the Indian Supreme Court.

Last week, Bachelet had also expressed concern over police inaction during the communal violence that took place in the Indian capital. Then too, the Indian government had said that the CAA was an internal matter of India.

Last year, at the 42nd session of the council in Geneva, Bachelet had said she was "deeply concerned" after India initiated its clampdown in occupied Kashmir.

India's move to annex Jammu and Kashmir through revocation of the region's special status and imposition of a communications and travel lockdown was also strongly criticised by independent UN experts who termed the moves as "collective punishment" for the entire population.


An earlier version of this article incorrectly referred to Michelle Bachelet as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. The error is regretted.

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...