COLOMBO: Sri Lanka’s government on Wednesday launched an investigation into a $700 million river diversion deal that had been finalised with a Chinese company weeks before the fall of the previous regime.

The cabinet set up a panel to probe the contract awarded to China CAMC Engineering on the eve of Mahinda Rajapakse’s defeat in the January 2015 presidential election, government spokesman Rajitha Senaratne said.

“Over four billion rupees [$30 million] had been paid just the day before the elections,” Senaratne told reporters. “We want to see whether it is feasible to go ahead with this project and if not, how we can recover the advances already paid to the Chinese firm.”

He said there were several irregularities in awarding the contract, worth nearly $700 million, and the new panel appointed by the cabinet would conduct a detailed study.

The new government, which came to power on a pledge to end corruption during Rajapakse’s decade in office, has already suspended some Chinese-funded projects. China, the largest single lender to Sri Lanka, secured contracts to build roads, railways and ports under Rajapakse, who is under investigation over allegations of graft.

Published in Dawn December 8th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.