LAHORE: A Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) leader and another person have filed separate petitions in the Lahore High Court challenging a ban on the film Maalik.

Mian Mahmoodur Rasheed of the PTI, also opposition leader in the Punjab Assembly, and Munir Ahmad stated in their petitions that the federal government unlawfully imposed the ban, as after the 18th Amendment this power had been devolved to provinces.

They said the film was banned after two weeks of its screening that showed sheer mala fide on the part of the government.

The petitioners contended that Maalik highlighted corruption and it was neither against the sovereignty of state nor social values.

They say the impugned notification proves that the ministry concerned not only exceeded its powers while imposing the ban, but also tried to assault the real essence of 18th Amendment only to save corrupt political elite of government.

The petitioners stated that the people of Pakistan had fundamental right to watch a film in view of Article 19 of the Constitution and the impugned ban was not in accordance with law.

Justice Shams Mahmood Mirza would take up these petitions on Monday. The judge has already sought reply from the government on a similar petition.

Published in Dawn, May 1st, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.