Summary trial under NAP a major challenge for govt

Published January 31, 2015
.—Photo courtesy: pakistanilaws.com
.—Photo courtesy: pakistanilaws.com
The image shows a policeman. - Online/File
The image shows a policeman. - Online/File

LAHORE: Police action against violators of six ordinances promulgated by the Punjab government under the National Action Plan (NAP) to eliminate sectarianism and terrorism has failed to bear fruits at initial stage as all suspects formally arrested and booked in cases since Jan 9 have secured bails from courts who have set aside summary trials for speedy convictions because of certain hiccups.

The lack of coordination and little realization of the importance of summary trials by police, prosecution and courts are said to be major factors behind the poor implementation of the National Action Plan.

Take a look: 329 people arrested under NAP

The summary trial with up to six-month jail is aimed at conviction of suspects within a day or two by producing evidence and witnesses. The ST also requires courts to convict or acquit the suspects within a day or two.


All offenders held under six ordinances get bails


Police across the province have arrested and booked thousands of people in connection with the Punjab Prohibition of Expressing Matters on Walls Act 2015, Punjab Sound Systems Regulation Ordinance 2015, Punjab Information of Temporary Residents Ordinance 2015, Punjab Arms Amendment Ordinance 2015, and Punjab Security of Vulnerable Establishment Ordinance 2015 since Jan 9.

Official statistics of Lahore police show that more than 1,500 people have so far been arrested and booked in cases since Jan 9.

Informed police sources told Dawn on Friday that the efforts had been initiated through meetings of Criminal Justice Coordination Committees exiting in all districts to take joint decision by stakeholders.

They said the crux of so far CJCC meetings chaired by district and sessions judges across the province was that judicial officers were not used to hold summary trials of suspects as they were not taken in loop by the government over NAP working.

Sources further said increasing pressure by legal fraternity to seek bails of suspects was another contributing factor that summary trials are not welcomed by district judiciary.

Sources said provincial police authorities had directed all field police officers to take up the sensitivity and sanctity of the NAP plan for better coordination among police, prosecution and judiciary.

They said three major suggestions, also discussed with the judiciary to speed up summary trial, were under consideration.

One such suggestion is to bring six ordinances out of the legal ambit of Code of Criminal Procedure like Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1197 which works independently during legal proceedings. Another suggestion is that the court must serve 24-hour notice to police before granting bail which will put the suspect in jail at least for a day. The third suggestion is that police must produce witnesses and submit challans for summary trial within a day for speeding conviction.

Published in Dawn, January 31st, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.