MNAs, media bodies at odds over space for terrorists

Published December 31, 2014
In this photo, Rangers personnel stand guard outside Parliament. — AFP/File
In this photo, Rangers personnel stand guard outside Parliament. — AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: Parliamentarians and representatives of print and electronic media failed on Tuesday to forge a consensus over coverage of terrorists and terrorist activities, with industry experts saying the government apparently wanted to impose restrictions on media organisations in the wake of carnage at a Peshawar school.

A set of suggestions about changes to laws on public disclosures were presented at a meeting of the National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Information, Broadcasting and National Heritage, but most of the proposals were opposed by representatives of the media industry.

The meeting, held in the Parliament House and presided over by Pakistan Muslim League-N MNA Marvi Memon, ended up discussing mostly impractical measures, according to some observers.

At the meeting, the Pakistan Broadcasters Association (PBA) was represented by Dr Basit Riaz, the All Pakistan Newspapers Society (APNS) by Sarmad Ali and the Council of Pakistan Newspaper Editors (CPNE) by Khushnood Ali Khan. Several representatives of the civil society also attended the meeting.

“The committee members either want to shut down all media organisations, including social media outlets, or they are looking for excuses to cover up their failures,” Khushnood Ali Khan of the CPNE told Dawn.

“All of us — the CPNE, PBA and APNS — told the committee that it will be much better to enforce the existing laws instead of trying to impose restrictions on us.

“...The committee’s proposals were too vague and inappropriate”.

Tuesday’s session was the second held by the committee to discuss recommendations for the media and to formulate set of mechanisms to counter the narrative of terrorists.

The committee also discussed proposals to restrict the dissemination of direct and quoted statements about confessions and threats of violence from members of the proscribed organisations.

Though the proposals were supported by members of the committee and the civil society representatives, the media industry experts opposed them.

During the meeting, meanwhile, the media experts as well as lawmakers remained confused over what was meant by “glorification of terrorists”.

It was suggested that monitoring social media outlets fell within the domain of Nacta.

Published in Dawn, December 31st, 2014

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...