FO rejects Indian allegations implicating Pakistan in held Kashmir attacks

Published December 8, 2014
Foreign Office spokeswoman Tasneem Aslam. — Photo courtesy: Press Information Department
Foreign Office spokeswoman Tasneem Aslam. — Photo courtesy: Press Information Department

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Foreign Office on Monday took strong exception to comments by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs implicating Pakistan in the recent attacks in held Kashmir.

“Pakistan rejects the allegations and efforts to malign Pakistan by implicating it in the recent attacks in Indian-held Kashmir,” said foreign office spokeswoman Tasneem Aslam, adding that Pakistan also firmly rejects the allegations about “mainstreaming of terrorism”.

Read: 17 dead as militants attack army camp in Indian-held Kashmir

Aslam said Pakistan has been at the forefront of combating terrorism and is its biggest victim.

“If any evidence of mainstreaming of terrorism in India was needed, one only had to look at the perpetrators of Samjohta Express attack and its masterminds,” she remarked.

At least 11 Indian troops and six suspected assailants were killed on Friday when militants attacked an army camp in Indian-held Kashmir.

The region was on a complete lockdown Monday as separatists called for a strike across disputed Kashmir, where Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi was due to lead a campaign rally for local elections.

The spokeswoman said that Pakistan takes its obligations under the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) mandate seriously, unlike India as manifested by its failure to implement the UNSC resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir.

Read: US brushes aside assumptions linking Pakistan to Kashmir violence

“The violence in Indian-held Kashmir is the result of decades of repressive Indian policies and imposition of sham elections in the region,” she said.

Aslam called upon India to understand that the people of Jammu and Kashmir would accept nothing short of their right to self-determination as promised to them by the UNSC and accepted by India and the international community.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...