Obama says US finishing Afghan job

Published May 27, 2014
President Barack Obama speaks about the future of US troops in Afghanistan, Tuesday, May 27, 2014, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. – AP Photo
President Barack Obama speaks about the future of US troops in Afghanistan, Tuesday, May 27, 2014, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. – AP Photo
President Barack Obama is greeted by US officials after arriving at Bagram Air Field for an unannounced visit on Sunday. – AP Photo
President Barack Obama is greeted by US officials after arriving at Bagram Air Field for an unannounced visit on Sunday. – AP Photo

WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama, seeking to turn the page on more than a decade of war, announced plans Tuesday for greatly reducing US forces in Afghanistan by the end of the year and then ending the US military commitment by the end of 2016.

He said American forces, first sent within a month of the Sept 11, 2001, attacks, have struck significant blows against al Qaeda's leadership, eliminated Osama bin Laden and prevented Afghanistan from being used as a base against the US.

“We have now been in Afghanistan longer than many Americans expected,” Obama acknowledged during an appearance in the White House Rose Garden.

“Now we're finishing the job we've started.”

Even as Obama set a timetable for the drawdown, he said he would keep nearly 10,000 American troops in Afghanistan after the US combat mission formally ends later this year. Those troops would focus on training Afghan security forces and on counterterrorism efforts.

“The bottom line is, it's time to turn the page on more than a decade in which so much of our foreign policy was focused on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.”

Obama sharply stepped up the US involvement in Afghanistan after his 2008 election victory, boosting troop numbers there even as he brought the parallel US operation in Iraq to a close.

He also massively increased the number of covert US drone strikes on militant targets in neighbouring Pakistan, and ordered the May 2011 US commando raid that killed bin Laden there.

As he announced the end of US involvement in a conflict which has claimed the lives of more than 2,300 US personnel, Obama said future security would hinge on the Afghans themselves.

“We have to recognise Afghanistan will not be a perfect place,” he said.

“And it is not America's responsibility to make it one. The future of Afghanistan must be decided by Afghans.”

US troops remaining in Afghanistan after 2014 would be available to train Afghan forces while supporting counter-terrorism operations against al Qaeda remnants, Obama said.

The withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan would herald a “new chapter in American foreign policy,” Obama said.

“(It) will allow us to redirect some of the resources saved by ending these wars to respond more nimbly to the changing threat of terrorism,” he said.

Noting the complexity of his drawdown plan, Obama said, “I think Americans have learned that it's harder to end wars than it is to begin them.”

The president said his plan was contingent on the Afghan government signing a bilateral security agreement with the US Afghan President Hamid Karzai has refused to sign the accord, but the US is optimistic that the two candidates seeking to replace him in the ongoing Afghan elections will finalise the agreement. Both have pledged to sign it.

Obama's blueprint calls for cutting the current US force of 32,000 to 9,800 by the start of next year. Those troops, dispatched throughout Afghanistan, would not be engaged in combat missions.

Over the course of 2015, the number of troops would be cut in half and consolidated in the capital of Kabul and at Bagram Air Field, the main US base in Afghanistan. Those remaining forces would largely be withdrawn by the end of 2016, with fewer than 1,000 remaining behind to staff a security office in Kabul.

Obama's decision is largely in line with what military commanders have been seeking and will allow the president to fully end the American-led military effort by the time he leaves office in January 2017.

The American forces would probably be bolstered by a few thousand Nato troops. The total Nato presence, including US troops, is expected to be around 12,000 at the start of next year.

Obama announced the drawdown plan a day after returning from a surprise weekend trip to Afghanistan where he met with US commanders and American forces serving in the closing months of America's longest war.

Top Republicans criticised the plan before Obama had even announced it, taking issue with his decision to publicly declare that troops would be out of Afghanistan after 2016.

“President Obama is not ending wars, he's losing them,” Senator Lindsey Graham, a frequent critic of Obama's foreign policy, wrote on Twitter.

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Howard “Buck” McKeon praised Obama's troop levels but questioned his timing and whether the president was replicating actions in Iraq, “where he abandoned the region to chaos.”

“Holding this mission to an arbitrary egg-timer doesn't make a lick of sense strategically,” McKeon said.

Ahead of his remarks, Obama was expected to speak with Karzai, who has had a tumultuous relationship with the White House. The two leaders did not see each other while Obama was in Afghanistan, but they did speak by phone as Air Force One was returning to Washington.

Obama has also discussed his plans with several European leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister David Cameron and Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi.

US military commanders have been arguing for months to keep roughly 10,000 troops in Afghanistan, if only for a limited time, while they bolster the Afghan forces' ability to do long-term logistical planning and increase their air force capabilities.

In recent weeks, the military had expressed confidence that they had been able to sell their plans to the White House.

Germany and Italy have said they will continue as lead nations in the north and west of Afghanistan, and there has been some discussion that the US would also have some troops in those areas to work with the allies.

After Karzai refused to sign the bilateral security agreement, Obama asked the Pentagon to plan for the possibility that all American forces would withdraw by a year-end 2014 deadline.

But given the supportive comments of the candidates in Afghanistan's presidential election, Obama signaled during his holiday weekend trip to Bagram that he was likely to keep some American troops in the country.

“After all the sacrifices we've made, we want to preserve the gains that you have helped to win, and we're going to make sure that Afghanistan can never again, ever, be used again to launch an attack against our country,” Obama declared.

At least 2,181 members of the US military have died during the nearly 13-year Afghan war and thousands more have been wounded – AP/AFP

Opinion

The risk of escalation

The risk of escalation

The silence of the US and some other Western countries over the raid on the Iranian consulate has only provided impunity to the Zionist state.

Editorial

Saudi FM’s visit
Updated 17 Apr, 2024

Saudi FM’s visit

The government of Shehbaz Sharif will have to manage a delicate balancing act with Pakistan’s traditional Saudi allies and its Iranian neighbours.
Dharna inquiry
17 Apr, 2024

Dharna inquiry

THE Supreme Court-sanctioned inquiry into the infamous Faizabad dharna of 2017 has turned out to be a damp squib. A...
Future energy
17 Apr, 2024

Future energy

PRIME MINISTER Shehbaz Sharif’s recent directive to the energy sector to curtail Pakistan’s staggering $27bn oil...
Tough talks
Updated 16 Apr, 2024

Tough talks

The key to unlocking fresh IMF funds lies in convincing the lender that Pakistan is now ready to undertake real reforms.
Caught unawares
Updated 16 Apr, 2024

Caught unawares

The government must prioritise the upgrading of infrastructure to withstand extreme weather.
Going off track
16 Apr, 2024

Going off track

LIKE many other state-owned enterprises in the country, Pakistan Railways is unable to deliver, while haemorrhaging...