LONDON, Sept 16: Investigating the murder of Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) leader Imran Farooq, the London police have said that the slain politician’s wish to launch a new political party before his death remains a key line of probe.

In a statement published on the Metropolitan Police website on Mr Farooq’s third death anniversary on Monday, the police announced a reward of up to £20,000 for anyone providing information leading to the identification, arrest and prosecution of those responsible for the murder.

On Sept 16, 2010, 50-year-old Farooq was on his way home from work when he was attacked in Green Lane, outside his London home. The post-mortem examination revealed that he died from multiple stab wounds.

MQM chief Altaf Hussain was also interrogated by the London Police over the murder as well as suspicions of money laundering.

The police, in the latest statement, said their detectives from the Met Police Counter-Terrorism Command were committed to finding those responsible for the crime.

“To date they have spoken to 4,076 people, reviewed 6,350 documents and followed up 2,114 lines of inquiry in order to bring his killers to justice,” the statement said.

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.