WASHINGTON, Nov 16: The US and Pakistani governments reached a deal in September that allows US drone attacks into Fata and enables Pakistan to publicly protest against them without the fear of contradiction, The Washington Post reported on Sunday.

“Officials describe the deal as one in which the US government refuses to publicly acknowledge the attacks while Pakistan’s government continues to complain noisily about the politically sensitive strikes,” the Post reported.

The deal led to a considerable increase in US air strikes since the installation of the new government in Islamabad, the Post said.

Recently, unmanned US drones have fired missiles into Pakistan at an average rate of once every four or five days, killing many civilians but also some militants. From December to August, when Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf stepped down, there were six US Predator strikes in Pakistan. Since August, there have been at least 19, the Post noted.

The newspaper indicated that an understanding on air strikes contributed to the suspension of ground assaults into Pakistan by helicopter-borne US commandos. Pakistan had vigorously protested a Sept 3 US ground attack inside Fata.

A spokesman for the Pakistan Embassy, when asked to comment on the Post’s story, said: “We never gave permission for such attacks” but the Post quoted a senior Pakistani official as not only confirming the deal but also as taking credit for improved cooperation with the US.

“Contrasting Mr Zardari with his predecessor, retired Gen Pervez Musharraf, the official said Musharraf ‘gave lip service but not effective support’ to the Americans. This government is delivering but not taking the credit,” the Post reported.

However, in Islamabad, a senior Pakistani official denied any understanding with the United States on drone attacks in the tribal areas.

Foreign office spokesman Muhammad Sadiq described the Washington Post report as baseless.

Talking to DawnNews, the Foreign Office spokesman said the American media kept publishing baseless reports on such agreements.

He noted that under the rules of engagement, only Pakistani troops could operate on their side of the Pakistan-Afghan border.

The Post, however, quoted the senior Pakistani official as saying that the US-Pakistani understanding over the air strikes was “the smart middle way for the moment”.

Citing a potentially more favourable popular view of President-elect Barack Obama, he said that “maybe with a new administration, public opinion will be more pro-American and we can start acknowledging more cooperation.”

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...