Elections without contest
By Manzoor Chandio
The unopposed election of nazims of 35 of the 44 union councils in four talukas of the Tharparkar district has come as a major surprise to political observers. What is equally surprising is that all the unchallenged nazims belong to the Khushaal Pakistan Group backed by the Sindh chief minister.
It may be mentioned that 1,037 nazims, naib nazims and councillors have been elected unopposed in 11 of the 23 districts of the province. In any country with genuine democratic credentials, the election commission would have ordered a probe to determine the causes of unopposed election of such a large number of candidates, particularly of the re-election of those who cannot claim to have done anything for their people.
The Tharis are as hungry today as they were yesterday. In democracies, people get all kinds of facilities to use their right to vote because only elected representatives can solve their problems.
But in Sindh, police, revenue and irrigation departments appear to have been given a free hand to harass and intimidate the candidates.
The opposition parties have alleged that their candidates in different union councils have been ‘kidnapped’, ‘detained’ and ‘harassed’ on different pretexts to prevent them from filing nomination papers and the government-backed candidates appeared determined to get elected unopposed.
A number of opposition candidates have been implicated in water theft cases and many others have been given false revenue bills by the irrigation department.
A candidate in UC Hamal Faqir Leghari says he was given Abyano (water tax) bill of Rs400,000 although he owns only 30 acres of land.
In Shikarpur district, an opposition candidate for the post of union council naib nazim was disqualified under an allegation that he belonged to the Jaish-i-Muhammad.
The opposition has also said that new districts and talukas were created to serve the interests of feudal and tribal lords.
Constituencies have been altered to the disadvantage of opposition parties.
District nazims were removed on the plea that they would use their influence in the election but the opposition alleges that government resources are being used in the election campaign by ministers, advisers and leaders of the parties in the ruling coalition.
The scenario emerging in Sindh reminds one of another idea “Strengthening democracy in Pakistan: a practical programme” — jointly authored in February 2002 by Shahid Javed Burki, a former vice-president of the World Bank who also served as finance minister of Pakistan, and Dr Mohammed Waseem, a respected professor of the Quaid-i-Azam University.
They had warned against bypassing political parties at the national, provincial or local levels and said that their marginalization would “amorphise, anarchise and atomize society”.
They said: “Parties are ultimately unifiers by establishing linkages across local, district and provincial boundaries”.
The rulers need to study this paper to assess the wisdom of their decision to hold the local polls on a non-party basis.
Analysts believe that the policy of depoliticization is aimed at perpetuating the domination of the Khaki and its hangers-on.
By holding party-less local body elections, politics based on ethnicity and Biradarism has been given chance.
Those elected with support of an ethnic group and a Biradari will employ, construct road, street and school of their own group.
Anywhere else in the world, many leaders are remembered for their role in nation-building and unifying the people.
But in this country, earlier, it was Establishment vs. people, Punjab vs. Sindh, Urban Sindh vs. Rural Sindh and now thanks to ‘enlightened moderation’, it is one town vs. another and one Biradari vs. another.
If sectarianism and ethnocentric politics are a legacy of Gen Zia, the era of Gen Musharraf will be remembered for elections without contest.

