WASHINGTON, Oct 5: Pakistan has accepted a US proposal to dye a fertiliser that is widely used in Afghanistan for making improvised explosive devices, diplomatic sources told Dawn.

The US military says that upwards of 80 per cent of the IEDs are made using calcium ammonium nitrate, a fertiliser produced in and imported into Pakistan, typically for agricultural purposes.

The United States recently asked Pakistan to dye the fertiliser red so that it could be easily detected by border guards along the Pak-Afghan border. “We have accepted the proposal and have already started colouring the fertiliser,” said a Pakistani official when contacted.

“We are willing to do whatever we can to overcome this problem as the IEDs also kill hundreds of Pakistanis.”

The Pakistanis, however, argue that more than 200,000 tons of fertilisers are produced in the country every year and less than a ton is required for making all the IEDs that are used in the region.

“That’s why we believe our Americans and Afghan allies need to enhance detection facilities at the border,” said the Pakistani official. “Colouring the fertiliser will definitely help detection but they need to do more.”

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.