India bars Sartaj Aziz from talking to media in Amritsar

Published December 4, 2016
Sartaj Aziz speaks during a news conference at the Foreign Ministry in Islamabad. —AFP
Sartaj Aziz speaks during a news conference at the Foreign Ministry in Islamabad. —AFP

The Indian government on Sunday did not allow Adviser to Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz to hold a scheduled press conference on the sidelines of Heart of Asia Conference, citing “security reasons”.

In sheer violation of diplomatic norms, the adviser was also barred from leaving the hotel premises and the media persons were not allowed to meet him in the hotel.

Furthermore, the Indian authorities stopped Pakistan's High Commissioner to India Abdul Basit to enter the Media Centre set up at the conference venue.

Arguments took place between High Commissioner Basit and security officials on his interaction with the Pakistani media persons.

Know more: Ghani, Modi lash out at Pakistan on terrorism at Heart of Asia moot in Amritsar

Later in the day, after returning from Amritsar, Aziz addressed a press conference in Islamabad and said, “Pakistan does not need to be pressurised in terms of counter-terrorism efforts.”

“We have done more in terms of counter-terrorism efforts in the last three years than any other country in the world.”

Aziz said we are now sharing our experiences of counter terrorism with the rest of the world.

Pakistan attended the conference to show solidarity with Afghanistan and the country’s commitment to peace and security in Afghanistan, he maintained.

‘No peace without resolution of Kashmir issue’

Pakistan's High Commissioner to India Abdul Basit said peace could not prevail in South Asia without the resolution of Kashmir dispute.

The lingering issue of Kashmir was the root cause of tensions between India and Pakistan and it must be resolved according to the wishes of Kashmiris, he said while talking to media on the sidelines of Heart of Asia Conference in Amritsar, India.

Pakistan, Basit said, had always favoured dialogue with India but on equal terms. He, however, added that Pakistan's desire for talks should not be misconstrued as its weakness.

He said Pakistan had been rendering sacrifices for last 35 years for durable peace in Afghanistan. The brunt borne by Pakistan (in the fight against terrorism) after 9/11 incident in the United States was known to all, he concluded.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...