Fans mob Yingluck days before referendum

Published August 6, 2016
Bangkok: Former Thai prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra greets supporters upon arrival at the Supreme Court on Friday for a trial on charges of criminal negligence related to a debt-ridden rice subsidy scheme during her administration.—Reuters
Bangkok: Former Thai prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra greets supporters upon arrival at the Supreme Court on Friday for a trial on charges of criminal negligence related to a debt-ridden rice subsidy scheme during her administration.—Reuters

BANGKOK: Hundreds of fans mobbed ex-premier Yingluck Shinawatra as she arrived at court on Friday to give evidence at her negligence trial, where she implored supporters to vote on a contentious referendum this weekend.

Yingluck, Thailand’s first female premier, was dumped from office by a court days before army chief Prayut Chan-O-Cha seized power in May 2014.

She was retroactively impeached over a financially ruinous rice subsidy scheme that funnelled cash to her farming base, and is facing a trial which could see her jailed for up to ten years.

The rice scheme was a major catalyst in the debilitating protests that presaged the military takeover.

In a sign of her enduring star power among supporters, Yingluck was met by several hundred people outside the court.

In a frenzied atmosphere, many supporters handed her red roses — a nod to the colour of their grassroots movement.

She repeated her plea of innocence of the negligence charge to the crowd, adding the billions of dollars of losses occurred after she was booted from office.

Yingluck also urged Thais to vote on Sunday’s referendum over a new military-scripted constitution, the first test of public opinion on the military’s handling of the country since its power grab. “I want to invite all Thais to go for the vote,” she said.

“I don’t want small turnout otherwise the result won’t be what we want if we want to see democracy have a future.” Yingluck’s Pheu Thai party has expressed fears of a low turnout on Sunday — with many among their rural support base unsure of how the new charter affects them.

Published in Dawn, August 6th, 2016

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...