Islamic State’s brutality

Published February 6, 2015
A file handout image obtained by AFP, shows a reproduction of a photo of Maaz al-Kassasbeh, who was captured and later killed by IS.—AFP/File
A file handout image obtained by AFP, shows a reproduction of a photo of Maaz al-Kassasbeh, who was captured and later killed by IS.—AFP/File

IT remains to be seen whether the strong verbal reaction to the recent burning to death of a Jordanian pilot and the beheading of two Japanese hostages will translate into a punitive response to the so-called Islamic State’s threat to human values in the cradle of civilisation.

The barbaric form of death inflicted on Jordan’s Moaz al-Kasasbeh and the killing of the Japanese hostages are only two examples of IS brutality in a long list of crimes against humanity since the group began its murderous but unstoppable military advance from western Iraq to sweep into Syria and reach the Turkish border.

Jordan’s King Abdullah II vowed an “earth-shattering response”, Saudi King Salman bin Abdul Aziz called the pilot’s murder an “odious crime”, Al Azhar denounced it as un-Islamic, while the UAE said this was “a brutal escalation” of the war by the terrorist group.

Know more: Jordan executes 2 Al Qaeda prisoners after IS kills pilot

An angry Japanese prime minister, Shinzo Abe, pledged his government’s continued support to the war on terror, and US President Barack Obama promised “decisive action”. But, despite this diplomatic rhetoric, the situation on the ground hasn’t changed much, and the IS militia looks unbeaten.

The only setback the militants have suffered is their failure to take Kobane. But this relative success for the US-led coalition was due to the tenacity shown by the Kurdish fighters.

Jordan has responded by hanging two jihadists, but, as remarked by the dead pilot’s father, execution is no response, because what is missing is a concerted military offensive commensurate with the task involved.

In fact, it is surprising that, with such a massive military presence in the region, the US is unable to reverse the IS tide.

Also puzzling is Turkey’s aloofness from the events unfolding in its ‘underbelly’, as is the total absence from the scene of the Iraqi government.

The truth is that vast sections of people in the Middle East do not believe all parties in the US-led coalition have their heart in the fighting, and the Islamic State’s militants enjoy many parties’ tacit sympathy.

Published in Dawn, February 6th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...