US health officials in hot seat over flawed Ebola response

Published October 17, 2014
WASHINGTON: White House press secretary Josh Earnest speaks about the response to the ongoing Ebola crisis at a press briefing at the White House on Thursday.—AP
WASHINGTON: White House press secretary Josh Earnest speaks about the response to the ongoing Ebola crisis at a press briefing at the White House on Thursday.—AP

WASHINGTON: Top US health officials faced a grilling on Thursday by lawmakers infuriated over the nation’s fumbling response to the Ebola outbreak, as the Obama administration scrambles to contain the disease’s spread.

Centres for Disease Control (CDC) director Thomas Frieden has become the most prominent target of the criticism, which has mounted as it emerged that a second Texas health care worker infected with the deadly disease was allowed to board a commercial flight despite reporting a low-grade fever.

Some lawmakers have demanded Frieden’s resignation and others have accused President Barack Obama of a lack of leadership.

Congressional leaders meanwhile are urging a travel ban to the United States on all citizens of the three West African nations hardest hit by the epidemic: Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone.

“The stakes in this battle couldn’t be any higher,” Tim Murphy, who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight, told a packed hearing with Frieden and other health experts.

“The trust and credibility of the administration and government are waning as the American public loses confidence each day with demonstrated failures of the current strategy,” he added.

Murphy, echoing other senior lawmakers like House Speaker John Boehner and Senator Marco Rubio, said he had “ongoing concern that administration officials still refuse to consider any travel restrictions” on people from West Africa entering the United States.

Some experts and lawmakers warned that isolating West Africa could further strain its health care resources.

Frieden and other officials acknowledged they still did not know how two Dallas nurses who treated a sick man contracted the virus, highlighting concerns about the government’s ability to prevent its spread. But Frieden insisted authorities could keep the hemorrhagic virus at bay in America.

“We remain confident that Ebola is not a significant public health threat to the United States,” he told the panel. “It is not transmitted easily, and it does not spread from people who are not ill”. That statement offered little consolation to worried lawmakers.

“People are scared. We need all hands on deck. We need a strategy,” House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Fred Upton warned. “People’s lives are at stake, and the response so far has been unacceptable”. But some warned of the dangers of sparking hysteria among the public.

“We need to put all of this in perspective, and not panic,” House Democrat Henry Waxman told the panel. The White House stressed that Obama, who cancelled political events Wednesday and Thursday in order to coordinate the US Ebola response, maintained confidence in Frieden.

Published in Dawn, October 17th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.