Al Qaeda trainer, not Adnan, captured

Published July 25, 2014
He escaped from jail in 2012 along with nearly 400 other militants.— File photo
He escaped from jail in 2012 along with nearly 400 other militants.— File photo

ISLAMABAD: Security officials said on Thursday they had arrested a top militant near the Afghan border but not a Pakistani Taliban leader who colleagues had identified last week as a man who once tried to blow up former president Pervez Musharraf.

The officials said on July 15 the military had captured Adnan Rashid, who was accused of trying to kill Gen Musharraf in a 2003 bomb attack and who later escaped from jail.

Some officials hailed the arrest, which followed a shootout, as the first major catch since the army launched an offensive against militants in North Waziristan along the Afghan border last month.

The government and army did not officially confirm the arrest at the time.

Later, various other security officials said it was not Rashid who had been captured but an important Al Qaeda bomb-maker and trainer.

“A high-value target has indeed been arrested but it is not Adnan Rashid,” one of the officials said. “There was a mix-up.” The official, who declined to be identified as he is not authorised to speak to the media, declined to identify the trainer or give details about him except to say he had extensive experience in training suicide bombers and making bombs.

Two other officials also said Rashid had not been arrested. Rashid is believed to be in his mid-30s and a former Pakistani Air Force officer who tried to become a suicide bomber before he was jailed for the attempt to blow up Mr Musharraf.

He escaped from jail in 2012 along with nearly 400 other militants.

Several Pakistani Taliban leaders also said Rashid had not been captured.

“The news that Adnan Rashid was arrested is completely baseless,” a Taliban leader who identified himself by his first name, Sabir, told Reuters by telephone. “He is free and safe and protected by his 12 suicide-bomber bodyguards who never leave his side. His family is with him.”

Published in Dawn, July 25th, 2014

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...