Pak-Afghan ties key to regional stability: US

Published July 14, 2014
The  Pakistan-Afghanistan border at Chaman, Balochistan. — File photo
The Pakistan-Afghanistan border at Chaman, Balochistan. — File photo

WASHINGTON: The stability of the entire region requires cooperation between Pakistan and Afghanistan, two top US military commanders have told Congress.

At their confirmation hearings this week, an admiral and a general, who are taking over the command of US forces in Afghanistan and other key regions, also pledged to encourage the two nations to work with each other.

Gen John F. Campbell, who has been nominated to lead American forces in Afghanistan, noted that Pakistan was postured to occupy a significant role in the security situation in Afghanistan.

Admiral William Gortney, who has been nominated to head the US Northern Command, told lawmakers that it was critical for the United States to have a partnership with Pakistan.

know more: Pak-Afghan ties

Gen Campbell agreed with the suggestion, saying that Pakistan would also continue to be a critical US partner in the South Asian region.

“If confirmed, I will continue to work with the Afghan military and the Pakistan military to continue to ensure that we can reduce” the differences between the two countries, Gen Campbell told the US Senate Armed Services Committee. He said he would also like to ensure that there was “great mil-to-mil” cooperation between the Afghans and Pakistanis. “They got to continue to work that,” he added.

Responding to a question, he said Pakistan’s first priority was its eastern border with India. “But it also continues to be concerned over growing Indian influence in Afghanistan. Pakistan is and will continue to be a critical partner in the region,” he said.

The general noted that both Afghanistan and Pakistan faced common threats from the terrorists who attack their civilian populations and threaten their long-term development. He urged both nations to work together to reduce cross-border militancy and resolve their differences.

This approach would not only enhance their security but will also bring stability to the entire region, he said.

Published in Dawn, July 14th, 2014

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...