Pre-marital sex immoral, says Delhi judge

Published January 6, 2014
Press Trust of India quoted Additional Sessions Judge Virender Bhat as also holding that a woman, especially grown up, educated and office-going, agreeing to submit a man on the assurance of marriage does so “at her own peril”.
— File Photo
Press Trust of India quoted Additional Sessions Judge Virender Bhat as also holding that a woman, especially grown up, educated and office-going, agreeing to submit a man on the assurance of marriage does so “at her own peril”. — File Photo

NEW DELHI: Pre-marital sex is “immoral” and against the “tenets of every religion”, a Delhi court has said while holding that every sexual act between two adults on the promise of marriage does not become rape, Press Trust of India reported on Sunday.

It quoted Additional Sessions Judge Virender Bhat as also holding that a woman, especially grown up, educated and office-going, agreeing to submit a man on the assurance of marriage does so “at her own peril”.

When a grown-up, educated and office-going woman subjects herself to act “with a friend or colleague on the latter’s promise that he would marry her, she does so at her own peril. She must be taken to understand the consequences of her act and must know that there is no guarantee that the boy would fulfil his promise,” PTI quoted the verdict as saying.

“He may or may not do so. She must understand that she is engaging in an act which not only is immoral but also against the tenets of every religion. No religion in the world allows pre-marital sex,” the court said, while acquitting an employee with a multinational company of the charges of rape.

The 29-year-old man, a resident of Punjab, was arrested by police after a month, when the woman, doing a secretarial and administrative job at a private company in Delhi, lodged a complaint of rape against him in May 2011. In her complaint, the woman, who is an orphan, had alleged that the man, whom she had met through a chat website in July 2006, used to have physical relations with her on several occasions by promising to marry her.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...