Asma says 21st amendment suicide attack on parliament

Published January 11, 2015
In this photo, leading human rights activist and former president of Supreme Court Bar Association Asma Jahangir gestures during an interview. — AFP/File
In this photo, leading human rights activist and former president of Supreme Court Bar Association Asma Jahangir gestures during an interview. — AFP/File

LAHORE: Former president of Supreme Court Bar Association and chairperson of Friends group, Asma Jahangir, has termed the 21st amendment a suicide attack on parliament.

She said the new legislation would have a serious impact on political discourse of the country.

She was talking to media persons on Saturday at Lahore Judicial Complex where she had come to cast her vote in the election of Lahore Bar Association.

She said the parliamentarians were ‘blackmailed’ on the issue of military courts.

Ms Jahangir said members of the parliament failed to question the reasons behind terrorism and to come up with a rational solution to curb the menace. She said former dictator Musharraf also tried to establish military courts but failed due to strong agitation by the civil society.

However, she regretted a democratic government itself delegated powers of the parliament to military courts.

When asked whether the new legislation could be challenged before the Supreme Court, she said assailing the law would be tantamount to undermining the parliament.

Professional group’s head Hamid Khan said the military courts would not be a right solution to terrorism. He said the nation had already faced failure of these courts in dictatorial regimes of Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan and Ziaul Haq. He said the executive also failed to improve law and order and it endorsed establishment of military courts to prosecute suspects without evidence.

He said he could not dispel the apprehension that the military courts would be used for political victimisation.

Published in Dawn January 11th , 2014

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...