Should feminists claim Aurat March’s ‘vulgar’ posters? Yes, absolutely

Feminism with conditions is no feminism.
Updated 22 Jan, 2020 10:21am

Kishwar Naheed has let us down.

At the Sindh Aurat Tanzeem celebration for women’s day, hardly a week after thousands of sinful women spilled out into the streets, chanting and marching for their rights, she said: The Aurat March slogans have transgressed cultural values, they have lost sight of tradition.

The same voice that once asked us to raise the banner of truth, to refuse to bow our heads, is now asking us to submit.

Women should not call themselves azaad, Kishwar says, we should locate our azaadi — our freedom — in the law, not in our bodies and tongues.

The feminist poet isn’t the only one who is upset. The entire country is suffering under the obscene weight of the Aurat March posters, particularly those which have blurred the line between women’s public and private lives, like the one depicting a girl sitting with her legs spread out, Lo Beth Gayi Sahi Se or the irreverent Akeli Awara Azaad, or the cheeky, Apni d*** pics apne paas rakho.

Also read: Let me womansplain the Aurat March to you

—All photos by author
—All photos by author

From Orya Maqbool to Aamir Liaquat, everyone is freaking out: Have women no shame? Do we not take pride in helping our brothers hunt for their socks? Shouldn’t we be grateful — we are women, blessed by nature, veiled and protected from the public — and now we want to discard that prestige? For what? Feminism has gone ‘too far’.

Of course, we expected this from the Mard Brigade — to descend with self-righteous hate every time a woman leaves her chaar diwari. Traditional masculinity has always had personal stakes in protecting ‘family values’, but the reproach is more confusing, even hurtful, when it comes from other women.

Women like Yasra Rizvi and Veena Malik, who are aligning with men — women who have resisted traditional codes of femininity by challenging the public-private boundary in their own lives — are now the same ones calling the Aurat March posters ‘vulgar’, saying they dilute the movement’s message and take away from its ‘real causes’.

These women want to support the March, they claim, but they are wary of the kind of feminism that has no qualms exiting the sphere of respectability.

These kinds of comments validate the male detractors’ cries and threaten to delegitimise the March, but more urgently, they force the rest of us into a fragile, perilous position.

Lest the entire movement be written off on the basis of a few posters and we lose the few people we have gathered on our side, we must clarify our politics and justify our purpose.

And so it is purpose we turn to. From fiery Twitter feeds to family WhatsApp groups, feminists of all ages have been engaging with critics to defend the March.

The most popular counter-argument, so far, is that the selection of ‘indecent’ posters does not represent the totality of the March’s politics.

That in fact, those who think the March didn’t address ‘actual’ feminist issues have probably never bothered to look up the manifesto, a comprehensive set of purposeful demands: An end to violence; environmental and economic justice; and reproductive rights.

To drive the point home, people have been posting photographs showing the posters that didn’t get as much air-time, posters addressing the range of ‘important’ causes that news anchors have accused the March of ignoring, like education, inheritance and marital rights.

In an Instagram story, Aurat March Lahore shared some of these with the caption: “If someone tells you the March didn’t address Real issues, send them this post.”

On national television, March organisers are repeatedly presenting this argument, and defending the March further: Since it was an open event guided by the principle of inclusivity, the posters could not possibly be policed.

Another organiser, when put on the spot about the poster Khana garam kardungi, bistar khud garam karlo, conceded that perhaps it shouldn’t have been there, but followed this with a quick jab at the media’s obsession with provocative posters over ‘real’ news.

Even in tough spots, and in the face of intense backlash and cyberbullying, feminists have been holding their ground admirably.

At the same time, much of this is the language of appeasement, and while one can understand how these arguments work in our favour, we have to be careful not to pacify.

This is a precarious moment in time. We must step back and consider what narratives we are collectively cementing. The boundaries of respectability cannot be one of them.

And yet they are. Because what are the implications of redirecting people to the manifesto when they bring up the posters? What separations are coded in the action of holding up this manifesto as a qualification of ‘real’ issues?

When we use the language of real and serious, we create a distinction between ‘actual’ issues and 'pretended' ones. When we rush to clarify that we have included ‘important’ causes in our demands, we suggest that other causes are unimportant.

We allow feminism to discriminate and gate keep, and this gatekeeping is patriarchy’s way of reinforcing the binary of purpose vs pleasure, where the feminism of purpose (health, education, marital rights) is ‘good’ feminism, and the feminism of pleasure (sexual politics, bodily autonomy, agency over time and leisure) is ‘bad’ feminism, ‘immoral’ and ‘frivolous’.

Examine: Can feminism be fun? In Lyari, it is

It pits the two against each other, rewarding the feminists who rally for legal rights and work-life balance, and slutshaming those who reclaim gendered slurs and carry the posters they did at the March.

Feminism with conditions is no feminism. It maintains the division between what is ‘acceptable’ and what is ‘immodest’, what is ‘public’ and ‘private’, allowed and not.

It is dangerous because it doesn’t simply deem some fights more ‘worthy’ and ‘respectable’ than others, it actively rejects and disqualifies the others.

By bringing up the manifesto to defend the posters, for instance, we distance ourselves from the supposedly provocative posters, and in fact confirm their ‘vulgarity’.

This is damaging, especially when done by March organisers who hold a bit more authority in the shared discourse. It insinuates that we agree that feminism should operate within the bounds of ‘respectability’.

I don’t believe that any of the feminists representing the March actually believe this, that they think feminist praxis should morally align with cultural values, or disapprove of any of the posters.

Yet, they are making the choice of shifting attention away from the posters as a strategy, and it is crucial to understand why.

It’s a tough compromise to make, but it’s made in consideration of our position and our audience. We can’t risk losing more audience. We are up against the right-wing and communist bros alike — neither are feminist fans and both force us to move a bit centre.

We have to make ourselves, our tones and strategies digestible because, as Tooba Syed pointed out on Twitter, we have to think long-term. Otherwise, we will lose the few we have on our side, and alienate even more.

And so sometimes we will have to appease: Reassure the patriarchy that our fights are ‘reasonable’ and ‘respectable’, and our interests do not threaten the institutions of marriage and family.

Sometimes we will have to retreat: Admit that it’s difficult to police, or that some slogans shouldn’t have been there. Already it is a difficult terrain to navigate, and it’s made all the more tricky on live television, where obnoxious show hosts are fired up by years of internalised misogyny.

Given everything, feminists and organisers have been managing the aftermath with grace and acuity. But, as I said earlier, we also need to zoom out and think about the sum of our stances.

This is not a time for respectability politics. In light of other feminists discrediting our disruptions, we have to amp up. The moment appeasement becomes our default, we will lose space.

This is the time to transgress more, in this beautiful moment when everything has exploded, when the scales are in the air and new norms are being set.

Learn: Why do girls posting attractive selfies make people uncomfortable?

If we compensate and reassure only, we will lose the little power we have gained, and soon others will be dictating to us what feminism should and shouldn’t be.

We need to regroup and strategise: Where do we simply show up and take space, and where do we take calculated risks to take back control of the narrative?

When someone finds a poster ‘vulgar’, perhaps we shouldn’t immediately say, But we can’t control people’s slogans, and have you read our manifesto? Perhaps we can start saying: Please educate yourself and read our demands, and also, know that we stand by these slogans and support each participant’s right to voice their subjective protests.

We need to locate both as central to the March’s politics, we need to own the manifesto and the so-called frivolous posters equally.

Because we need to challenge the notion that these things are separate, that the politics of pleasure are somehow irrelevant to the more ‘pressing’ feminist concerns.

We need to claim these posters and make the connection between them and the ‘larger’ feminist struggles. Like Nighat Dad has said, we need to unpack what they’re saying.

A girl’s right to sit with her legs open is about her agency to do what she likes with her body without reprimand or harassment, it is about her right to move freely, it is about victim-blaming and whose fault it is when someone is assaulted — not the girl’s, no matter how she was sitting.

A poster that says Akeli Awara Azad is about sexual autonomy and reproductive rights, about financial autonomy, about the choice to enter or not enter the institution of marriage, about shirking the link that ties men’s honour to our bodies.

A poster that says Aaj Waqayi Maa Behn Ek Ho Rahi Hai is about language and reclamation, but also sisterhood and solidarity, this beautiful moment when thousands of women, who are taught to be each other's enemies, are walking in solidarity together.

And all of this is also about the politics of pleasure, which doesn’t just open up new possibilities for access and freedom, it also fortifies the fights we have already won.

Read more: Teaching literature on female friendship in the #MeToo era

A body in control of its everyday desires and pleasures, of every inch of its space and time, is a body that is truly free, in both public and private.

In fact, it is only the binary of pleasure and purpose that keep intact the binary of public and private. Women don’t step outside, either because the streets are pronounced unsafe for us, or because, what need do women have of everyday pleasure? We have duties to tend to, we have men whose honour is located in our bodies.

And so we are consigned to private spaces, and pushed further into them if there is any trouble — which explains the Mard March demanding we pick up our dupattas again and get cooking — and yet, it is in private spaces where we court the greatest dangers, where the threat of assault is most prevalent, and where, when we are harmed, the walls around us remind us to stay silent. Like ‘good’, ‘honourable’ women.

‘Respectable’ women don’t blur boundaries, they do not bring their private lives into the public, they do not discard their dupattas and call themselves badchallan.

No, they stay within the ‘safety’ of their homes, which is conflated with duty, culture, tradition, tehzeeb.

The only feminism for us to aspire to, then, is the one that disrupts the private sphere, that rejects a femininity modelled solely around purpose, that celebrates the frivolous and the silly, that disrupts tradition and culture.

And it is precisely culture and tradition, someone should remind Kishwar Naheed, that are upturned when thousands of women come out into the streets, dancing and laughing with joy.

Are you examining the lives of Pakistani women? Share your insights with us at


Author Image

Sadia Khatri is a writer based in Karachi. She has worked as a journalist at Dawn and The Kathmandu Post, and as a reportage editor with Papercuts Magazine. She writes fiction and non-fiction, dealing with themes of gender, public spaces, visual culture, cities and poetry, and is currently writing her first book, a memoir on the life and work of the late Kashmiri-American poet, Agha Shahid Ali. She is also one of the founders of the feminist collective Girls at Dhabas

The views expressed by this writer and commenters below do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.

Comments (35) Closed

Mar 15, 2019 05:53pm
a thoughtful answer to critics
Recommend 0
Asfandyar Khan
Mar 15, 2019 06:43pm
Today womens want to do all those things that traditionally mens do i-e bad things for which mens were always ciriticised by their elders but today's women wants to do or wants to try those bad things also infact they take this as an achievement For ex My dad smokes i never liked his habbit and i have told him alot of times and he himself admits that its a bad habbit but he is 56 so its not possible for him to let go this habbit but if i told this to a woman she will get offended easily.
Recommend 0
Mar 15, 2019 07:06pm
This. Every word of this. We would all do well to keep these points in mind and not back down when arguing with critics of this march. Our march.
Recommend 0
Mar 15, 2019 07:39pm
I have not read the word 'pleasure' as many times in one article before! Happy women happy world. Way to go!
Recommend 0
Mar 15, 2019 09:40pm
@Asfandyar Khan Depends on how you see it, Men had the freedom to do whatever they wanted to ... Men who used to smoke were portrayed as 'cool' while women women smokers were mostly represented as loose women. When you start looking from a humanistic perspective you will start understanding
Recommend 0
Mar 15, 2019 10:42pm
Please take them lightly. I actually found lot of comments very funny and amusing. Pakistanis have habit of seeing every thing seriously .
Recommend 0
Jamil Soomro, New York City
Mar 15, 2019 11:32pm
Where have the women we men used to see on the Silver Screen of 50's and 60's Pakistani and Indian Movies gone? The answer is blowing in the wind.
Recommend 0
Mar 15, 2019 11:33pm
Kishwar Naheed tried to restore sanity in Aurat March...but the tiny minority of feminists in Pakistan would prefer to become tinier
Recommend 0
Mar 15, 2019 11:56pm
Vulgarity is not in the Aurat March,it is in the mind of someone who almost always turns out to be a secret connoisseur of all things vulgar.
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 12:50am
To cut it short, this year's aurat march was neither thoughtful nor thought provoking. It is not about the perspective but this conclusion is reached by most of the observers from almost every walk of life. It could have been better and I hope the emotions will cool down and eventually participants will learn from their mistakes and will come up with a constructive show with lesser but healthy controversies next year.
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 01:27am
"Do we not take pride in helping our brothers hunt for their socks?" _ _ Sadia Khatri, that is a classic.
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 01:29am
@tuk, ..... _ Happy wife. Happy life.
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 01:31am
@shahid, _ So true. People cannot survive without a sense of humor.
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 01:32am
@Jamil Soomro, New York City, .......... _ Blowing in the wind or no longer brainwashed?
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 01:51am
I am all for women freedom and equal rights but at the same time women should be a women and that's how the can succeed the most.
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 02:47am
I just my wife is not one of these women.
Recommend 0
Gender E
Mar 16, 2019 03:27am
@Murshid, you nailed it in one example. We the men and the religious leaders (mass majority in our society) - narrow minded, close minded, aggressive, and possessive of 50% of the population - the woman. We soffocate their freedom and the one life they have live. Aurat March - a platform for women solidarity and women expression. Let the world know what you are and what your rights are what your feelings are and how your life should be. So if a women smoke cigaret she is considered perhaps modern advance western but if the same smoke goes in lungs of a man he is considered cool guy. Cool guy do not know that cigarette smoking cause cancer. I like your example.
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 03:38am
There is a double standards here. Polite behaviour is expected from women while men are allowed literally to get away with murder. Standards of decency are totally ignored for men but elevated for women. Independance ia valued for men but frowned upon for women. Yes we get it ,women are and should not be competing with men for vulgar behaviour but what they are saying I have the God given right to freedom of choice and no man has the right to take that away from me. Each gender is equally responsible for their own behaviour
Recommend 0
Eye opener
Mar 16, 2019 06:45am
Quiet interestingly, comments are not raised by any lady or any feminist, because they do not even care to read articles about their cause. The cry s a very easy and un responsible way while effort and hard work is the core way to achieve one's desires.
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 08:09am
@Life, It got everyone talking. So thought provoking it most certainly was. More power to all women.
Recommend 0
Mir Jehan Zeb,MD
Mar 16, 2019 10:49am
It is time women are treated with respect and on equal footing with men. The sexist misogynist culture must come to an end.
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 02:03pm
Agree with every word. Thank you for this
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 07:31pm
More power to Aurat March
Recommend 0
Mar 16, 2019 10:56pm
Totally agree with Kishwar Naheed. Nobody is against the women rights but the issues could have been highlighted in a modest manner. The controversial comments put a dent on the aurat March cause.
Recommend 0
Mar 17, 2019 01:45am
Excellent article, nailed it. People who are genuinely interested in understanding what the 'vulgar' slogans or posters stand for and how they tie into a woman's emotional and physical well-being will make the effort to read the manifesto, while sexists will continue trying to discredit the movement, via posters or whatever else they can nitpick on.
Recommend 0
Mar 17, 2019 07:03am
Yet no doubt many of the posters were too vulgar to be put on in a decent society. One won't see such vulgar in the developed countries. Whatever they do, they do it within limits. That is what makes them the developed countries.
Recommend 0
Mar 17, 2019 07:25am
Good article. Sometimes one has to cross a line or two to make a point ... hopefully more people (from both genders) will take part in next year's Aurat March ... very happy to note that tolerance is growing in our society as I can't imagine this March in Zia era ... of course education is the key ...
Recommend 0
Mar 17, 2019 09:16pm
Women even when they protest for their rights have to protest per the standards that men set for them which by the way, men don't follow. How funny!
Recommend 0
Mar 18, 2019 03:27am
@RIZ, YOU don't get to define how women should or should not be. You just define yourself. Women will define themselves. Without help from you or others.
Recommend 0
Mar 18, 2019 03:34am
@KG, Yes exactly. We are expected to adhere to the expectations and standards of men even when we protest. They want to define how, where, what we express. Some even want to define us, our identity. Absurd, isn't it?
Recommend 0
Arif Yusuf
Mar 18, 2019 12:15pm
i support this Aurat March. Would like to be part of it and I assure that I can contribute
Recommend 0
Mar 18, 2019 12:50pm
The negative and anti-women criticisms appearing against Aurat March are unjustified and repulsive. Talking of morality, what morals do the majority of men have? Salams
Recommend 0
Mar 18, 2019 01:28pm
Word "feminism" is being mistreated in all contexts. Women have the right to vote, ride a bike, work in the profession of their choice, own a business, be a wife, be in a kitchen, go out with the man of her choice. There is nothing that a woman cannot do in today's Pakistan or urban Pakistan at least. If you're an under achiever or a complete loser, stop misusing feminism for your own grievances.
Recommend 0
Mar 18, 2019 04:59pm
@Laila, Not exactly... I can tell of scores of women who are opposed to this whole Aurat March thing that was on display and even protested against it... Like it or not, it does come down to the discussion of traditions and religious values... Some are inclined to follow them, some are not... and that applies to both men and women....
Recommend 0
Mar 18, 2019 08:45pm
Bad behaviour, be it from a male or a female is equally indicative of a repressive society. If a male is called a stud for having multiple girlfriends, we need to make that an issue, rather than some "feminists" claiming that women have that same right. When with equality, we start to subject men and women to the same values of respect that are important then we will head towards a prosperous and progressive society.
Recommend 0