PAKISTAN has become more visible in global climate conversations.

Targets have been articulated. Frameworks have been updated. The language of transition now appears regularly in policy and corporate discourse.

The harder question is whether or not the country is financially equipped to deliver what it has promised.

That question feels more pressing now in 2026.

In March, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) kept the policy rate unchanged at 10.5 per cent and explicitly cited the war in the Middle East as a source of higher fuel prices, freight costs and insurance costs.

February inflation had already risen to 6.98pc year-on-year, while inflation for March was expected to remain in the 7-8% range, reflecting continued pressure from fuel prices, freight costs and external volatility.

In an economy that imports energy and remains sensitive to external shocks, these pressures directly translate to higher borrowing costs, tighter liquidity and reduced room for long-horizon investment.

As a result, climate conversations become more acute.

Climate transition requires capital.

Renewable energy, water resilience, industrial decarbonisation, urban adaptation and disaster preparedness all depend on upfront financing, stable policy signals, and credible execution structures.

Pakistan’s own climate plans now reflect the scale. Pakistan’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC 3.0) under the Paris Agreement, commits to reducing projected emissions by 50pc by 2035, with 17pc to be achieved domestically and 33pc conditional on international support.

The same submission estimates climate finance needs at $565.7 billion through 2035.

Progress remains uneven. While renewable capacity has expanded and policy frameworks have evolved, financing, project readiness and execution continue to lag behind the scale required to meet these targets.

The wider financing gap is also substantial.

The World Bank’s Pakistan Country Climate and Development Report estimates around $348 billion in climate and development investment needs between 2023 and 2030.

The same report warns that climate and environmental risks could reduce Pakistan’s gross domestic product (GDP) by 18-20pc by 2050.

The issue, as such, is not a shortage of ambition. It is whether the financial and institutional machinery exists to convert ambition into projects that can actually move.

Pakistan’s corporate sector has to step up its game for the larger good, suggests Dr Zeelaf Munir

Pakistan’s targets span far more than headline emission numbers.

NDC 3.0 reiterates the country’s 60pc renewable energy target by 2030 and links climate strategy to adaptation priorities across water, agriculture, health, ecosystems, cities and disaster preparedness.

These are not peripheral development issues.

They sit within the core questions of growth, productivity and economic resilience. Yet, climate delivery still tends to stall at a familiar point; execution.

Finance plays a central role in this regard.

Projects may have policy relevance and technical merit, but investors and lenders focus on different questions.

How is the risk divided? Is disclosure reliable? What about currency exposure? And, perhaps most importantly, will it actually be delivered?

In a high-rate, risk-sensitive environment, weak structuring can quietly derail projects.

This derailment is not always through outright rejection, but through slower approvals, higher costs, reduced investor appetite, and stricter scrutiny on disclosure and governance.

This is increasingly how global capital works, especially in emerging markets.

Climate readiness is starting to overlap with financial stability.

Other Asian economies are moving faster in building that architecture.

Vietnam, for instance, initiated Green Taxonomy in 2025, giving lenders and investors an official classification framework for green economic activity.

Besides, India has moved listed companies further towards the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) framework, and sustainability disclosure requirements even as implementation timelines continue to evolve.

Also, Bangladesh’s financial system has built concessional windows and refinancing schemes for sustainable finance, while its export sector, especially garments, has used green-factory certification to strengthen buyer confidence and global positioning.

These examples differ in approach, but they point in the same direction: climate ambition becomes credible when it is backed by financial frameworks, disclosure discipline, and institutional follow-through.

Pakistan has begun to build parts of this ecosystem too.

The government has introduced the Pakistan Green Taxonomy, and the SBP has directed banks and development finance institutions (DFIs) to use it as a reference point for green banking policies.

A taxonomy goes beyond defining what is ‘green’, and gives lenders, investors, companies and regulators a shared framework for identifying eligible activities, structuring financing products and directing capital more consistently.

It also opens the doors for tools, like green bonds, green loans, transition plans, more credible disclosure practices, and efforts to attract climate finance.

This is where green finance becomes directly relevant to Pakistan’s climate agenda.

If projects are to move beyond announcements, they need to be structured with financing in mind from the outset.

This means better project preparation, stronger disclosure, clearer use-of-proceeds frameworks, and wider use of mechanisms, such as blended finance, guarantees and risk-sharing structures, where appropriate.

Green finance is one of the main channels through which climate policy becomes executable rather than a side conversation.

The government, of course, cannot do this alone; business institutions must play their role as well.

The Centre of Excellence in Responsible Business (CERB), housed within the Pakistan Business Council (PBC), is already doing work that matters to this transition.

Its climate-risk platform includes a Climate Change Readiness Study, a Climate Risk Awareness Toolkit, workshops in major cities, ESG resources, and guidance designed to help Pakistani businesses prepare for reporting in line with International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) guidelines and international investment expectations.

This kind of capacity-building is directly relevant in a market where many firms still need practical support on risk assessment, disclosure, governance and transition planning.

Social awareness and advocacy platforms, such as Breathe Pakistan, can make a difference.

Their value lies in whether or not they can push the discussion beyond general commitments, and towards financing questions that actually matter: bankable pipelines, risk-sharing mechanisms, disclosure readiness, and implementation models that connect policy ambition with commercial reality.

This is precisely where the climate debate in Pakistan stands today. Pakistan’s climate ambitions continue to evolve.

The real test is whether or not capital, policy and execution can move forward together and at the required pace.

The writer is Chairperson of the Pakistan Business Council (PBC) and Managing Director & CEO of EBM.