Opposition parties have accused Prime Minister Imran Khan of intimidating broadcasters into a blackout on television coverage of his critics, after several TV channels were briefly taken off-air and opposition protests and news conferences passed unreported.
The prime minister denies censoring the media and described such accusations as “a joke” during a visit to Washington in July, but relations with the press and broadcasters have become increasingly strained since he took office nearly a year ago.
Fuelling the criticism, as Prime Minister Imran headed back from the United States last Wednesday a news conference by opposition leader Maryam Nawaz, which would normally be carried live on TV news stations, went unseen as broadcasters held back from coverage.
“Pakistan’s media is facing the worst censorship,” Maryam told the news conference, which was broadcast on YouTube. “If any news channel tries to air our presser or rallies, it is threatened to go off air.”
Media managers were reluctant to comment publicly when contacted by Reuters, but statements from industry bodies have complained about pressure on journalists and their employers.
News groups have also been alarmed by proposals to establish special courts to hear cases relating to the media.
The All Pakistan Newspapers Society (APNS) described the proposal as institutionalised “arm-twisting”.
“The media is already braving strong pressures in the form of press advice and measures of intimidation from ruling quarters which are tantamount to undeclared censorship,” it said.
Prime Minister Imran's government dismisses the criticism and says it is dealing with the consequences of abuses by past administrations, who it says used lucrative government advertising business to buy favourable coverage.
His Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) party earlier this month posted a series of tweets warning media houses and journalists that they should not “end up propagating (the) enemy’s stance” in criticising the government.
Pakistan’s press has had a turbulent relationship with successive governments and the powerful military over many years. Some in the media complained of a severe crackdown in the run up to the 2018 general election that saw PTI sweep to power.
Writers and bloggers say several cases of reporters being abducted and beaten, critical columnists being denied space, advertising business cut to media houses and sackings of unfavourable TV commentators have created a climate of fear and self-censorship.
The military and government have denied state agencies have been involved in any of those incidents. They also reject opposition accusations that the army colluded in bringing the PTI to power.
PML-N says it is the main target of a renewed crackdown, which comes after it aired a video apparently showing one of the judges who convicted party founder and former prime minister Nawaz Sharif last year on corruption charges saying he had been blackmailed to deliver a guilty verdict. The judge, who later denied the allegations, has since been sacked.
In recent weeks planned interviews with party leader Maryam have been pulled without explanation at the last minute, while her voice has been repeatedly muted mysteriously during interviews.
Geo News TV has suffered a series of problems since late July.
Coverage was abruptly suspended and its position on cable dials dropped from a favourable place at the top of the list to a slot near the bottom.
Geo TV’s Managing Director Azhar Abbas said the broadcaster had received no warning or explanation and had not been notified of who had ordered the changes.
“The closure is without any prior notice to the organisation by the regulatory authority or the government,” he told Reuters. “We have made fervent attempts to reach out to ... the military media wing, but officials there also deny any involvement.”
Three other TV channels, 24 News, AbbTakk News and Capital TV, were shut down for one day after they gave Maryam Nawaz live coverage earlier this month.
“I was informed by management that they received instructions this couldn’t be carried,” said Najam Sethi, a 24 News anchor, who had scheduled an interview with Maryam.
“We, media owners and journalists alike, are in a state of siege. Pressure to control, manipulate, plant, tilt, block and propagate the news and analysis cycle comes from overt and covert civil-military platforms. Big brother isn’t just watching anymore. He is cracking the whip and it’s painful.”
Ansar Naqvi, the station’s director programming and current affairs, said Sethi was asked not to conduct the interview in line with a request from the country’s broadcasting regulator.
“We have verbal instructions from the regulator to ban Maryam’s coverage completely,” he told Reuters, adding that there was no written directive.
Mohammad Tahir, spokesman for the state-run regulator Pakistan Electronic Media Authority (Pemra), denied that it had issued instructions to broadcasters not to run interviews. Asked who pulled the interviews, he told Reuters: “We didn’t.”
The government’s main spokesperson, Firdous Aashiq Awan, told a meeting of Pakistani newspaper editors in Karachi last week that the Pemra was an independent body just doing its job. She did not comment on who was behind the blackouts.
The Pakistan Broadcast Association (PBA) has condemned the shutdowns, while the US-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) said the blockage of Geo TV was “an unfortunate illustration of how widespread censorship has become in Pakistan”.
Journalists’ bodies in Pakistan have held demonstrations nationwide.
Reporters without Borders said in a statement last week that Pemra, “takes its lead from the military establishment”.
The military, which denies accusations of interfering in civilian matters, said it would not respond to unspecified accusations.
In Washington, Prime Minister Imran dismissed concerns about media freedom, saying it was freer than the media in Britain.
“The criticism I have received from my own press, unprecedented,” he said. “So, to say that there are curbs on Pakistan press is a joke.”