Dawn.com recaps developments that occurred between the Indian spy's arrest in March 2016 and the upcoming ICJ verdict.
The arrest of Indian spy Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav became the talking point for millions of people living on either side of the India-Pakistan border after news emerged on March 3, 2016, that he was captured by the Pakistani military in Balochistan while trying to cross into the country from Iran.
The military termed his capture the “proof of Indian interference and state-sponsored terrorism”.
What followed in the months to come was a saga of India's counter-claims; confessions and accusations; and a Field General Court Martial trial for Jadhav on espionage, sabotage and terrorism charges, until the case landed in the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
India approached the World Court against the Pakistani military tribunal's decision to sentence Jadhav to death, and a stay was granted on his execution.
The spy's case, which had stretched on for more than three years, took a decisive turn when the ICJ ruled on India's objection on July 17, finding that he has a right to consular access and requested Pakistan to reconsider his sentence.
Dawn.com recaps the major developments that have taken place since Jadhav's arrest in March 2016.
Kulbhushan Jadhav, an alleged Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) agent operating under the cover name of Hossein Mubarak Patel, is arrested in a counter-intelligence operation in Balochistan's Mashkel area for his involvement in espionage and sabotage activities against Pakistan.
A confessional statement is released by the Inter-Services Public Relations in which Jadhav claims to be a serving Indian Navy officer. New Delhi issues a statement the same day, claiming that he was a former navy officer and is not currently serving. India denies any links with the spy and seeks consular access to him. It also says there is no evidence of his arrest in Balochistan.
Pakistan lodges First Information Report against Jadhav in Counter-Terrorism Department Quetta.
Initial interrogation is carried out of the Indian spy.
Since Jadhav was arrested for trying to illegally cross Iran to enter Balochistan, the Pakistani government contacts Iran and on June 16, Iran finally responds. The contents of its response are not shared with the media.
Pakistan’s ambassador to the United Nations Maleeha Lodhi presents a dossier to the UN chief regarding India's involvement in cross-border terrorism in Pakistan and Jadhav's arrest.
The Lahore High Court Bar Association (LHCBA) warns lawyers against pursuing the appeal of Jadhav against his conviction by the military court.
LHCBA secretary Amir Saeed Rawn says that the lawyers will not allow release of Jadhav who has been "found guilty of playing with the lives of innocent people in Pakistan".
India moves the International Court of Justice against Pakistan, accusing the latter of violating the Vienna Convention in Jadhav's case.
ICJ stays Jadhav's execution by Pakistan "till the final decision of this court".
The UN's top court also rejects Pakistan's argument that the ICJ does not have jurisdiction in the matter, reasoning that it can hear the case because it involves, on the face of it, an alleged violation of one of the clauses of the Vienna Convention, which both Pakistan and India ascribe to and whose interpretation falls under its purview.
A second confessional statement of Jadhav is released in which he admits to working with the banned Baloch Liberation Army and Baloch Republican Army to carry out subversive activities in Balochistan. He also seeks mercy from the army chief over his death sentence.
India submits written pleadings to the ICJ, accusing Pakistan of violating the Vienna Convention by denying consular access to Jadhav.
Pakistan offers a meeting between Jadhav and his wife, in Pakistan, on humanitarian grounds.
The Foreign Office hosts a meeting between Jadhav and his mother and wife. The meeting held as a goodwill gesture ends in a diplomatic spat between the two countries over the security checks Jadhav’s mother and wife underwent and the language restrictions during the meeting.
Indian news website The Quint publishes an article stating that Jadhav was employed by RAW as part of "renewed efforts to use human sources as deep penetration agents in Pakistan". The article is retracted by the website within hours.
A major Indian magazine, Frontline, in an article acknowledges that Jadhav may be a serving Indian Navy officer and that India is waging a covert war against Pakistan.
An official tells Dawn that Jadhav is now undergoing trial on terrorism and sabotage charges. Meanwhile, Pakistan seeks access to 13 Indian officials to ascertain information about the Jadhav case but New Delhi remains uncooperative.
The first official confrontation since the Pulwama attack takes place between Pakistan and India as the ICJ begins its four-day public hearing. New Delhi asks the UN's top court to annul Jadhav’s conviction.
More on the ICJ hearing: India fails to answer critical questions in Jadhav case: Pakistan
The ICJ announces through a press release that it will deliver its final judgement in the Jadhav case on July 17.
The ICJ delivers its judgment on the merits in the Jadhav case ruling that he has a right to consular access and notification.
The Court requests Pakistan to review the original verdict and reconsider his sentence. However, most of India's appeals, including his release and safe passage to India are rejected.
Data compiled by Sarah Shamim, Design: Marium Ali