ALL too often, Pakistan and India throw up examples of why normalising relations between the two countries is so difficult. On Tuesday, the Pakistani government set out to announce the imminent release of an Indian prisoner held in a Pakistani prison for many years. The initial indications from the Pakistani side on the identity of the prisoner pointed towards Sarabjeet Singh, a man convicted of committing acts of terrorism on Pakistani soil. Cue the media — in this case largely the Indian media but also joined by its Pakistani counterparts — whipping up a frenzy of coverage and questions. In the absence of a formal confirmation but supported by Pakistani officials with an unfortunate knack for mixing up names, the two countries debated the merits of transferring Sarabjeet Singh to Indian custody. A few hours later, the truth trickled out: the man set to be released was Surjeet Singh, convicted for spying for India during the Zia era. What ought to have been a positive development, then, turned into a fiasco as questions on both sides of the border focused on poor civil-military relations in Pakistan and whether the military had yet again scuttled an initiative by the civilian government. These were questions that could have been easily avoided had government officials here been clearer about whom the government intended to release and the media more careful about verifying the details before running the story.

Having said that, behind the Sarabjeet-Surjeet mix-up lies an important issue: cross-border prisoners in India and Pakistan who have served out their prison terms or are jailed for lengthy periods on flimsy or frivolous grounds. These victims of the Pakistan-India dynamic ought to be spared the personal misery that is heaped on them because the two states cannot work out an arrangement to ensure the timely repatriation of each other’s citizens and, even before that, to ensure that only serious crimes lead to extended detention periods. The 315 Indian fishermen, including 14 teenage boys, who were released yesterday after the intervention of an NGO exemplify the problem: fortunate as they are to be returning to their homes in India, ought they to have been detained and imprisoned for long spells in Pakistan in the first place? The same thing occurs over in India. Surely the two countries can work out some pre-emptive measures at this stage.

Finally, the fierce reaction in some quarters here to the (incorrect) news that Sarabjeet Singh is to be released indicates much work remains to be done for populations on both sides of the Pakistan-India border to better understand and empathise with one another.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...