Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


Blind justice

Published Jun 13, 2012 09:00pm


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

THERE is a reason why the figure of Justice is depicted as she is, holding a set of scales, a sword, and her eyes covered by a blindfold.

The scales suspended from her right hand represent the relative strength of a case’s arguments, for and against. The double-edged sword symbolises the power of Reason and Justice. The blindfold is to spare her eyes from witnessing the trauma of what happens in her name in our Pakistani courtrooms.

No one in our country — whatever their political affiliation — can feel proud of the present situation. The chief justice of our Supreme Court is being pilloried for the second time in his judicial career. The last time he stood his ground by refusing to resign. He became a cause célèbre and the sound-bite darling of the media. Today, he is being hounded by that very same wolf-pack of yesterday’s admirers.

Jurisprudence has evolved over the millennia to protect the rights of man from the wrongdoing of fellow man. It does not, however, offer equivalent protection to those who have been appointed to adjudicate. Their courtroom is the well of public opinion, their jury the press.

In 1991, for example, President George Bush nominated Clarence Thomas to replace Justice Thurgood Marshall as the second African American justice on the Supreme Court. The opposition to Thomas was unexpectedly vitriolic and unprecedented. He complained to the Senate Judiciary Committee that was conducting the hearings into his suitability: “This is a case in which this sleaze, this dirt, was searched for by staffers of members of this committee. It was then leaked to the media. And this committee and this body validated it and displayed it in prime time over our entire nation.”

Thomas had grown up in the age of the Ku Klux Klan. He knew the connotation of the word ‘lynching’ when he applied it to the proceedings of the Senate committee and the savagery of the press. “This is a circus,” he told his tormentors. “It’s a national disgrace. And from my standpoint, as a black American, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas, and it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. You will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the US Senate rather than hung from a tree.”

Not surprisingly, Clarence Thomas reached a point during the hearings where he questioned whether any post — even a seat on the exalted bench of the Supreme Court of the United States — was worth such a humiliation.

One wonders whether our chief justice has had similar moments of doubt, of despair, of defeatism. It cannot be easy for him to act as the conscience of a society that has allowed itself to be lobotomised, its nerves severed, its capacity to feel pain so diminished that it can play with fire without smelling its own burning flesh.

It is clear that we Pakistanis have reached a depth of insensitivity where pain like the Marquis de Sade’s experiments knows no limits. We refuse to improve, to stand above ourselves, preferring instead to pull down those who presume to rise above us. Those who could stand outside the rest of us have demonstrated that detachment by migrating. Those who have remained in the country do so either out of necessity or out of a belief in an afterlife here on earth. There is no evidence to support that faith.

The recent budget should be proof enough of the gulf between the government’s self-perception of its performance and the reality of its incompetence. Our railway system is at a standstill. If its runs at all, it runs at a loss. Our national airline has more planes grounded than it has in the air. Its middle-aged cabin staff mirrors the obsolescence of its fleet.

On fiscal policy, the governor of our State Bank can confide in the Wall Street Journal but not in parliament. Energy is what the common man expends in trying to obtain it from impotent distribution companies that are themselves hostage to Wapda, KESC, IPPs and RPPs. Motorists who opted for CNG in the hope that they would get cheaper fuel have to queue the night before in a bread line of vehicles. Energy now follows its own calendar of meatless days.

The human cost of deprivation and suffering is incalculable and therefore, like some fearsome contingent liability, appears on no one’s books. Commuters travelling on buses die instead of reaching their destinations, precious surgeons are mown down in cold blood, national icons made targets, and infants incinerated in their incubators without a tear from officialdom to extinguish the fire that ended their lives so prematurely.

There are millions of us who are not fortunate enough to have flats in Edgware Road or duplexes in Park Lane, or ancestral chateaux in France, or estates our wives bought us in Bani Galla. We do not have more foreign passports than we have spouses. We do not have the unaccountable wealth needed to pose as representatives of the people.

What we do have is infinite patience, the endurance that has sustained us through years of depredation. We have the right to expect a government of our choice, and have the power of a vote that will allow us to decide in tranches of five years, again, and again, and if need be yet again, until one of us — the government or the electorate — gets it right.

Meanwhile, no one should remove the blindfold from the figure of Justice. She should be spared the unedifying spectacle of a chief justice of our country himself in the dock.

The writer is an author.

The views expressed by this writer and commenters below do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.

Most Popular

Comments (7) Closed

Khan Jun 14, 2012 03:46pm
How does a father not know that his son is living a life beyond his means? Justice may be blind in the court room, but what about his own household? Who is the CJ trying to dupe? People of the country or himself? I am sure Malik is no angel either, any businessman knows what it takes to be in business in Pakistan. Corruption is so deeply rooted that it does not seem like corruption any longer. Scratching each others backs to get things done is the norm. Keep watching this new soap opera, in the end nothing will happen. The Judiciary was a joke in Pakistan, and will remain so unless the young generation develops guts to fight and die for it.
Guest16 Jun 14, 2012 03:27am
Sir, maybe we should talk about the corruption that you have brought to my former school, Aitchison College. The sons of politicians that you like to appease and because of whom this country is in the dilapidated state that it is in. Please refrain from hypocrisy!
malik62 Jun 14, 2012 06:17am
Well said and Well ended Except allow me to disagree with your last line . Its well documented and repeated time and again by the honr.CJP where ever and when ever he addressed peoples of Laws , I Quote in the simplest english i can muster to repeat his words " No one is above the rule of law and that Only abiding by the law and up holding the constitution will get us out of the mess of past 6 decades " Now If the Law asks the same honr CJP to be in the dock and testify against or in favoure of his own off spring , then let it be and let the Blindfold of the Lady of justice be removed too so that she can too see the actual spoken words of he custodian be put to practice . we have heard enough of verbal sermons from every body including the honr CJP , Let him set the shining example of standing in the witness dock and clarify the mysteries of his beloved yet suppose to be faltering offspring . Let him bear the pains llike millions of other fathers of this 180Millions Pure feel every day and every night when their offsprings are accused and held up by the so called law enforcing agencies . At least here is a father who can still see his faltering son free and able to do what he wants to . Let the Father stand up and either defend or destory his own son . Why Dr Alsalan Chowdhury be given a different treatment while other accused are haulled before the same CJP ??? Why I ask ???
Cyrus Howell Jun 14, 2012 06:36am
"The truth will set you free, but first it will make you miserable." + -- James A. Garfield (American President - (born 1831-died 1881)
Cyrus Howell Jun 14, 2012 06:50am
"I did not say it would be easy. I only said it would be the truth." -- Morpheus
Muhammad Iqbal Jun 14, 2012 07:10am
A worthwhile article and true feelings. thank you for writing it. In CJs case even if it goes against him I would still salute him for his courage and actions he has taken for the interest of his people. Long live CJ :)
Reginald Massey Jun 14, 2012 09:53am
Brilliant and spot on.