Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


China’s path to reform

Published Mar 19, 2012 11:30pm


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

LAST week’s dismissal of Bo Xilai, the party secretary of Chongqing province, casts this autumn’s Chinese Communist Party Congress, with the anticipated replacement of President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao by Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang, in a dramatic new light.

Bo Xilai, son of a former Communist Party leader and veteran of the Long March, has been exploiting his office for a thinly veiled campaign for a place on the standing committee that runs China. His fall was triggered when his right-hand man, the police chief Wang Lijun, sought refuge in the American consulate in Chengdu, claiming that his life was under threat from Bo.

The coup de grace was delivered by Wen at the annual National People’s Congress, when he warned that China risked another “historical tragedy” like the cultural revolution. Bo’s dismissal followed almost immediately.

It is not surprising that tensions in the Chinese Communist Party should be running high at this time. The forthcoming congress will decide who will run China for the next 10 years. Profound policy questions are at stake. After 30 years of extraordinary economic growth, China is the world’s second-largest economy and a major global power. It is a very different country from the one in which Deng Xiaoping launched his reforms: fundamental changes now confront the new leadership.

First, the era of cheap labour and low value-added production is coming to an end as the economy becomes increasingly sophisticated: a major shift in economic strategy is under way. Second, China has acquired a panoply of global interests that require its foreign policy to be rethought. Third, the enormous growth in social inequality, combined with mounting corruption, has fostered a sense of grievance that could threaten the country’s stability. And fourth, major political reform must be instituted.

Debate and argument is no stranger to Beijing. When a country is growing at around 10 per cent per annum, it is constantly throwing up huge new problems that demand solution. There is a presumption in the West that there is little discussion and argument in China. This is wrong: it would be impossible to go through the kind of change that China has experienced without it provoking major conflicts. And because China now faces the need for a major policy shift on several fronts, this has been intensifying. Beijing is currently home to the world’s most interesting debates.

Could the conflicts get out of hand? Wen’s reminder about the lessons of the cultural revolution was patently a reference to Bo Xilai’s conduct in Chongqing, where he has been accused of ignoring legal procedures in the name of a crackdown on organised crime, using torture to extract confessions, and targeting powerful businesspeople who are not his allies.

He has combined this with a populist political campaign that has carried distant echoes of the cultural revolution. China has come a long way since those dark days, when lawlessness and arbitrary authority reigned. If not the rule of law, there is certainly now a much greater respect for due procedure. But the revelations about Bo’s behaviour indicate that old attitudes and practices still persist, and are perhaps even widespread, and could — under certain circumstances — provide the basis for a serious political regression.

More likely, however, is that the process of growing political accountability and openness will continue and deepen. This is not to suggest that China is on the verge of introducing universal suffrage and a multiparty system, which is the knee-jerk western response to any mention of political reform. Political reform will be gradual and cautious.

We can already detect some of its characteristics. The constraints on the media have been considerably loosened, while the internet has provided, except on the most sensitive issues, a platform for a convulsive and hard-hitting debate. — The Guardian, London


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

The views expressed by this writer and commenters below do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.

Comments (1) Closed

j. von hettlingen Mar 20, 2012 04:19pm
China has no appetite for reversing the path it's treading. Wen Jiabao, someone who reads Western political philosophy and seems to know Adam Smith's works by heart, doesn't want to let an opportnist and populist like Bo Xilai to turn China's clock back. In his eyes Bo Xilai was preaching water and drinking wine. Suave and sophisticated, the latter was seen as a Western-style politician, who sent his son to study at Harrow in Britain. Yet he sought to revitalise interest in the country's communist past under Mao Zedong. Now the Politburo Standing Committe has to decide whether it is wise to keep the course, maintaining one-party rule and trying to sustain economic growth under the state-capitalist model, or to revive reform, not just economically but also politically.