Winona Ryder convicted of theft

Published November 8, 2002

BEVERLY HILLS, Nov 7: After all the hype, all the insinuation and a defense conspiracy theory that could only have been written in Hollywood, actress Winona Ryder was convicted on Wednesday of shoplifting from one of the most upscale stores in Beverly Hills.

A jury that included at least three people from the entertainment industry convicted the “Age of Innocence” star of walking out of Saks Fifth Avenue last December with shopping bags stuffed full of 5,500 dollars in designer tops, handbags, glittery rhinestone hair bows and socks.

Prosecutors, who suggested that Ryder may have stolen for thrills, said they would not seek jail time for the 31-year-old actress when she is sentenced on Dec 6, although the charges carry a possible prison sentence of up to three years.

The jury found her guilty of grand theft and vandalism but not guilty of commercial burglary. That charge required proof that she had gone to the store intending to steal.

Ryder did not testify in her own defense during a humiliating six-day trial, where her haul of ripped silk tops and leather handbags costing up to 700 dollars each were put on display for all to see.

The “Girl, Interrupted” star, whose career has been on hold during the 10 months since her arrest, looked tense but poised in a standing-room-only courtroom as the verdicts were read.

She was whisked out of court and away from the media but her publicist told Reuters her car was followed by news helicopters and paparazzi.

Ryder later issued a one-sentence statement thanking her family, friends and supporters for standing by her.

Why a rich celebrity should commit such a tawdry crime was left to guesswork. “I cannot get inside her head. She may have been stealing for the thrill of it, or to see if she could get away with it,” trial prosecutor Ann Rundle said.

Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley said he hoped the court would “address the problems of the defendant that may have led her to engage in the criminal conduct of which she now stands convicted.”

One of the jurors was quoted as telling the TV show “Celebrity Justice” that the jury was “especially impressed” by the merchandise displayed in court and thought the Saks guards called as witnesses were “very credible and admirable.”—Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...