Thousands hold anti-war rally in London

Published September 29, 2002

LONDON, Sept 28: Waving anti-war banners and chanting slogans against “Bomber Bush and Bomber Blair”, tens of thousands of Britons joined a big peace rally in London to oppose a military strike on Iraq.

Joint organizers Stop the War Coalition and the Muslim Association of Britain estimated at least 100,000 people had joined the march from the River Thames, near parliament, to Hyde Park, in the heart of the British capital.

A number of groups and individuals backed the march — from “rebel” members of the ruling Labour Party and the mayor of London, to trade unions, religious leaders, artists, pop stars, intellectuals, rights activists and Gulf war veterans.

“Our message to the U.S. and British governments is that they would be very foolish to defy a coalition of this breadth and diversity. Just sticking a U.N. fig leaf on this does not make it any more humane,” Stop the War spokesman Mike Marqusee said at the start of the march soon after midday.

Not surprisingly, protesters directed their wrath at U.S. President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

“Bomber Bush, Bomber Blair, we’ll resist you everywhere!” chanted British students at the march.

“Hopefully our leaders will see the huge feeling against the war,” said Anne Gleeson, a school catering assistant marching with her husband and two children. All wore Palestinian scarves.

MUSLIMS JOIN MARCH: The demonstrators were rallying under two main slogans — “Don’t Attack Iraq” and “Freedom for Palestine”. Police said 40,000 people had assembled by early afternoon, but organizers put the figure at more than 100,000 and said that could double.

Ismail Adam Patel, head of a Muslim group, Friends Of Al’Aqsa, said the two issues were inextricable. “Until we solve the Palestine issue, we are not going to get any peace in the Middle East. Why are we going after Iraq when Israel has far more weapons of mass destruction?” he wondered.

Thousands of Muslims, from Britain’s 2.5 million-strong Islamic community, joined Saturday’s march. Many protesters brought children with them. Some Church of England ministers were also dotted among the demonstrators.

Polls show most of Britain’s 60 million people would oppose their nation joining a purely US-led attempt to topple Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. But the picture changes if the United Nations approves such action, with roughly two-thirds then in favour, according to recent surveys.

Most of Blair’s critics dislike Saddam as much as the prime minister, but they say a war on Iraq would be an unjustified act of aggression which would destabilize the Middle East, cement U.S. world hegemony, and snub international public opinion.

Opponents also say Washington and London are behaving hypocritically given their previous support of Iraq under Saddam in the years before the 1991 invasion, and are refusing to admit their real economic motives for wanting to control Iraqi oil.

“Everyone in Britain must know now that the real issue is not Saddam and his weapons but America’s need for oil,” wrote veteran left-wing politician Tony Benn, a speaker at the rally.

Former U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter, who resigned his post in 1998 and has been campaigning this year to prevent a U.S.-led attack on Iraq, said there was still no evidence or sufficient global support to justify an attack.—Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...