US may lose peace in winning

Published November 11, 2001

MOSCOW: America’s use of massive military force in Afghanistan could win the war but lose the peace, the former Soviet defence minister who withdrew Moscow’s troops from the Asian nation said on Friday.

“If you carry out carpet bombing as the Americans are doing now you can win, but what will be left? You could destroy the entire population,” Dmitry Yazov said.

“The Americans don’t understand that by fighting Osama bin Laden, they are provoking the wrath of the whole Afghan population,” Yazov said in a rare interview. “You can have a military breakthrough but lose politically.”

Yazov, 78, was Mikhail Gorbachev’s defence minister in 1989 when the Soviet Union pulled out from Afghanistan after a nine-year war. The top-ranking Soviet marshal later broke with Gorbachev and backed a failed coup against him in August 1991.

The United States has bombed Afghanistan heavily in its fight against the Taliban and Osama bin Laden, whom they blame for the World Trade Centre attack. Washington says its bombing is carefully aimed at military targets.

Yazov said Washington could outdo Soviet military efforts in Afghanistan because Moscow held back from all-out war.

“Do you really think that having defeated Germany, Japan, practically every European government, we could not deal with Afghanistan?” he said. “If we had done everything correctly we should have not gone in at all. But once we had intervened, we should have acted more decisively. We didn’t try to win. We wanted to help, but not everyone accepted our help so we left.

Yazov played a central role in the Soviets’ Afghan war that badly strained relations with the West. He was military commander for the neighbouring Central Asia Soviet states early in the war and then served as defence minister from 1987-91.

Although he still describes the invasion as an intervention at Kabul’s request — the official Soviet line — Yazov said Moscow badly misjudged the struggle for Afghan hearts and minds. The lesson serves as a warning to the United States today.

“The main lesson was that the Afghan people did not support the presence of Soviet forces, although they welcomed material help,” Yazov said. “We were uninvited guests and we our presence did not cement society but divided it instead. We didn’t understand what Islam and religion was, and who really was in charge of the villages, the local Muslims.”

The Soviet pullout opened the way for the Taliban’s rise and the growth of Osama’s influence. But their embrace of terrorism stemmed from a business rather than a religious need, Yazov argues.

“To protect their narco-business, they started to create terrorist organisations. The main goal for the terrorists was to earn money through the drugs trade,” he said. —Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...