Russia breaks nuclear boycott on India

Published November 10, 2001

NEW DELHI: By finalizing a deal to transfer two large nuclear power reactors to India, Russia this week broke an international boycott on transfer of nuclear equipment imposed as punishment when New Delhi first exploded a nuclear device almost 30 years ago.

Concluded in Moscow during Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s visit, the deal facilitates transfer of two reactors for a three billion dollar power station at Kudankulam village on the coast of southern Tamil Nadu where they are expected to generate 2,000 megawatts of power.

While the international boycott slowed down India’s ambitious nuclear programme it by no means halted it, either for the production of power or for defence, as demonstrated by a second round of tests in May 1998.

India is not a signatory to the 1970 Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) and does not accept full-scope inspections of its nuclear facilities by the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), established in 1975 and of which Russia is a member, prohibits the export of nuclear technology to countries which do not accept full-scope safeguards.

Indeed, soon after the present Bush administration took over, it demanded that Russia stop supplying nuclear fuel to reactors at the Tarapore power plant near Mumbai city although the plant observes full IAEA safeguards and was in fact originally installed by the US power giant General Electric in 1969.

The US stopped supplies of nuclear fuel for the reactors after 1974 but India kept the reactors running by sourcing fuel from France and China, apart from Russia which kept up supply even after the 1998 nuclear tests.

Leading anti-nuclear and environmental groups like Greenpeace International have charged the Indian government with maintaining close links between its nuclear energy and its nuclear weapons programmes.

Russia appears unconcerned by charges that India’s nuclear power and weapon programmes are linked.

The conclusion of the Kudankulam deal this week has not so far evoked any reaction from Washington and the Hindu newspaper’s analyst C. Raja Mohan has speculated that it might even serve as a cue for Washington to review its policy on non-cooperation with India in the civilian nuclear energy sector.

According to the activists the project has all the makings of another Chernobyl and is being pushed through without making environmental, seismological or epidemiological assessments in a thickly- populated, poverty-stricken area of the country. —Dawn/The InterPress News Service.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...