LONDON: The corrosive impact of the Iraq crisis in almost all areas of international relations, as well as on Iraq's long- suffering civilians, was dramatically demonstrated on Thursday by the UN general secretary Kofi Annan's blunt declaration that last year's war was illegal.

The recent spat between the US and Iraq's northern neighbour Turkey is a case in point. Since the war officially ended, Turkey has fretted about Iraq's possible fragmentation, Kurdish separatism, and the safety of Iraq's ethnic Turk minority.

When US forces attacked the city of Tal Afar, home to many Turkomen, last week, Ankara finally drew the line. Unless they called a "total stop" to the fighting there, the foreign minister Abdullah Gul said, Turkey would suspend all cooperation: and that would include closing the vital supply lines to northern Iraq.

Thus has a "liberated" Iraq achieved by default something that Saddam Hussein never could: an open if temporary rupture between the US and a key Muslim ally which is now increasingly identifying with the EU.

Turkey's concern about regional stability is shared by Iraq's other neighbours. Jordan and Syria have good cause for alarm, and according to a new study by the Chatham House think tank in London, full-scale civil war in Iraq would ineluctably draw in Saudi Arabia in support of the Sunni minority.

The war has had a deeply destabilizing impact on the House of Saud. It has further strained ties with the US already badly frayed by 9/11. Whereas in the past, Saudi militants, principally from Al Qaeda, have gone abroad to pursue their aims, the US occupation of Iraq has drawn them to a new base, awash with arms and munitions, from which to attack western interests in Saudi Arabia.

On Wednesday another Briton fell victim to that barely contained internal breakdown, fatally shot in Riyadh. "In all likelihood, Saudi Arabia will be contaminated in the same way as Afghanistan," the Chatham House study says. "Osama bin Laden's ideological children are returning to his homeland."

One thing at stake is the west's oil supply. If the Iraq war really was about securing the Middle East oilfields, then George Bush may be well on the way to achieving the exact opposite.

Another ostensibly unsettling consequence is that Iran may emerge stronger, in regional terms; another potential case of the US shooting itself in the foot. Iranian economic, cultural and political influence with Iraq's Shia majority is growing.

An isolated Syria is ever more dependent on Iranian goodwill. And the US is so bogged down militarily that, it is argued, the chances of aggression against Tehran are now diminishing.

For these reasons Iran's dominant conservatives hope the US will agree to unconditional dialogue. However, civil war in Iraq could just as easily suck them in against the US on the side of the Shias.

In this unpredictable, potentially chaotic regional evolution can be heard the death knell for Mr Bush's "Greater Middle East Initiative" to deliver democracy to all the Arabs. And his infamous doctrine of pre-emptive strikes, preventive war and forcible regime change also seems to be dying in the aftermath of its first application in Iraq. - Dawn/The Guardian News Service.