WASHINGTON, Aug 11: The US government argued on Tuesday that "war on terror" detainees at the naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, had no right to meet a lawyer, even if they try to contest their imprisonment in civilian courts.

Lawyers for the inmates had asked a federal court in Washington to allow them to meet with the Guantanamo detainees. Government lawyers on Tuesday filed a 26-page document laying out their argument for why the detainees should be denied access to their attorneys.

The government lawyers argued that a June ruling by the US Supreme Court, which recognized the detainees' right to challenge their imprisonment in civilian courts, did not explicitly grant them a right to be represented by a lawyer in that process.

The ruling "says nothing at all" to suggest that the inmates have "a right to counsel, much less a right to the type of unrestricted access to counsel they seek, in order to pursue their case," according to the government's brief.

No "principle of law or reason entitles alien enemy combatants detained on a military base outside the sovereign territory of the United States to define the terms of their access to counsel," it read.

The Supreme Court indeed "has left a great deal of issues in doubt in its June decision," said Georgetown University professor Jonathan Turley. "There are more holes than cheese in its opinion, in defining the specific rights and process detainees must be accorded." -AFP

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...