ISLAMABAD, July 16: The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed 48 identical appeals against a Lahore High Court ruling that upheld the removal of several Nazims and Naib Nazims of different union and Tehsil councils in the Punjab province.

The appeals by five Nazims, 40 Naib Nazims and three supportive councillors of union and Tehsil councils had challenged sections 85 and 92 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001 for being ultra vires of the ordinance itself as well as the 1973 Constitution.

The petitioners were of the view that these provisions were discriminatory and violative of Article 25 (equality of citizens) of the Constitution. The five Nazims and 40 Naib Nazims, elected under the Punjab Local Government Elections Ordinance 2001, were ousted from their offices through no-confidence motions by their respective councils.

Their dismissals were challenged in the Lahore High Court which upheld their removal on March 24. The petitioners appealed to the Supreme Court on the ground that no-confidence motions violated the provisions of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance as the Nazims and Naib Nazims were elected by the same electorate under the joint system of candidacy.

Advocate General, Punjab, Shabbir Raza Rizvi while defending the high court decision before a two-member Supreme Court bench, comprising Chief Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui and Justice Faqir Mohammad Khokhar, said the court had no jurisdiction to settle the matter as no provision of the Legal Framework Order (LFO) under article 270 AA of the Constitution could be challenged before any forum except the parliament.

He also argued that under the relevant laws, the union administration and union council were two different entities. Though a Nazim was responsible for the administrative affairs of a union or Tehsil council, a Naib Nazim could only preside over meetings in the absence of the Nazim.

He said article 25 of the Constitution did not apply in the present case as it ensured equality between equals while the functions and roles of Nazims and Naib Nazims were totally different.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...