BEIJING, Jan 20: Japan's riskiest deployment of troops since World War Two made China wince on Tuesday, but other Asian victims of Japanese wartime aggression seemed to take the news in its stride.

An advance party of about 35 Japanese soldiers, who will prepare for the likely deployment of about 1,000 troops, arrived at a military camp in southern Iraq on Monday, marking a historic shift away from Japan's purely defensive post-war security policy.

"We express concern over this movement," a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman said. "It would be in line with Japan's interests and conducive to peace and stability in the region and the world if Japan abided by its policy of 'defence limited to its own territory and coastal waters' in earnest and stuck to the road of peaceful development."

Japan and China normalized relations in 1972, but ties have been dogged by their World War Two past characterized by the occupation of parts of China by Japanese troops.

China says 300,000 civilians died in the 1937 Nanjing massacre when Japanese imperial troops overran the Chinese Nationalist capital. China's comments on Tuesday appeared muted in comparison with the fiery rhetoric it has used after visits to the Yasukuni Shrine to Japan's war dead by a succession of prime ministers.

"China is much more confident than before, so its reaction to such issues is more rational than before," said Jin Canrong, an international relations expert at People's University.

A law enacted last July allows the troop dispatch, but Japan's pacifist post-war constitution limits the military's activity to "non-combat zones", a murky concept in Iraq, where occupying troops are under daily attack.

On the Korean peninsula, a Japanese colony from 1910 to 1945, reaction was split. In North Korea, the ruling Worker's Party mouthpiece newspaper Rodong Sinmun said talk in Tokyo of a revamp of Japan's defence posture if the Iraq deployment is a success "reveals the aggressive nature of Japan turning to the right and heading for its militarization".

There has been no official reaction and little media attention paid to the Iraq troop deployment by Japan in South Korea, which itself has decided to send 3,000 troops to Iraq in April to augment the 675 already working there.

In Singapore, occupied by Japan from 1942-45, the Straits Times newspaper said it was "churlish and short-sighted" to argue that the troop deployment was a sign of rising militarism in Japan.

Rather, Japan could help create a secure and stable Iraq. "For the sake of Iraq, political stability in the Middle East, the security of oil supplies and the cut-no-corners war on terror, Japan and other countries must persevere with the hard work of bringing Iraq back to normal," it said. "Fear is not an option."

The Japanese troops will be based in the Shia-dominated southern city of Samawa, where they will conduct reconstruction and humanitarian operations. Japanese forces have taken part in UN operations since a 1992 law made that possible. -Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...