LONDON, Oct 20: Nato members are wavering in their political commitment to Afghanistan, one of the alliance’s top commanders said on Monday, describing the near seven-year campaign against the Taliban as disjointed.

Pointing to more than 70 “caveats” that give individual countries a veto over certain operations, and the fact that troop commitments remain unfulfilled, General John Craddock said he was fearful the operation was being short-changed.

“We are demonstrating a political will that is in my judgment sometimes wavering,” Craddock, a US general and Nato’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe, said in a speech to policymakers and defence analysts in London.

“It’s this wavering political will that impedes operational progress and brings into question the relevance of the alliance here in the 21st century,” he said.

Nato troops serve in Afghanistan under a United Nations mandate. That mandate initially limited their operations to Kabul, but in 2003 was expanded to give Nato a wider role to support the Afghan government throughout the country.

As insecurity has increased in Afghanistan – this year is the most deadly since the conflict began in 2001 – Nato troops have steadily been drawn into more deadly operations, a factor that has dissuaded some nations from deeper involvement.

Craddock defended the view expressed by Britain’s outgoing commander in Afghanistan, Brigadier Mark Carleton-Smith, that the Taliban could not be defeated militarily and that at some level militants needed to be drawn into a dialogue.

“His comments are generally in line with what our military and political leaders have been saying all along... The conflict in Afghanistan cannot be won by military means alone,” Craddock, who serves as Nato’s operational commander, said.

“We in the international community must come together as part of a truly comprehensive approach (in Afghanistan). The current effort remains disjointed in time and space.”

Addressing Pakistan, Craddock emphasised the need for close cooperation with its security forces and appeared to defend the US military’s policy of pursuing militants across the border into Pakistan, saying self-defence was paramount.

He also said he believed there had been an increase in foreign fighters in Afghanistan, but did not say from where or how many. Many Taliban are Pukhtun tribesmen from Pakistan.—Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...