WASHINGTON, March 21: The Bush administration has decided that the military tribunals it proposes to establish to try high-ranking Al Qaeda and Taliban members will provide right of appeal and capital punishment will be possible only through a unanimous verdict.

These apparent concessions in the original plans for the tribunals have followed criticism from America’s European allies and international human rights groups that have pointed out that the tribunals could violate the rights of suspects. Before Sept 11, the United States itself had campaigned against establishment of special courts or tribunals in other countries.

Likely candidates for the military courts are the Al Qaeda/Taliban fighters incarcerated at Camp X-ray in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, but of the 300 prisoners there, most are said to be ordinary soldiers. The military courts are supposed to be meant for senior Taliban and Al Qaeda men and a decision to establish them was taken in the anticipation that Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan would provide a rich haul of such leaders. This has not happened, with former minister Mutawakkil perhaps the highest-ranking Taliban leader currently in custody (of Afghan authorities).

While making some concessions to suspects’ rights, the rules for the military tribunals will still provide for admissibility of hearsay and secondhand evidence, which is not permissible in civil courts here.

The trials will be open to the public and the defendants will be able to hear the evidence against them. But hearings can be ordered to be closed when it is determined that classified information will be produced. Defendants will be provided with lawyers at government expense and can also hire their own advocates. However, appeals against the verdicts will lie with higher military panels nominated by the president rather than an independent judicial authority.

The device of military tribunals has not been invoked in the US since the days of the Truman administration immediately after World War II.

The rules for the military commissions or tribunals were formally announced by Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon on Thursday afternoon, when he said there would be a presumption of innocence of the accused during trials before the commissions and cases would have to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused would have the right to call witnesses.

A two-third majority would be needed for a conviction, and a unanimous verdict in the case of capital punishment. The secretary said every effort was made to ensure a just outcome by the commissions.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...