British Airways fined £121.5m

Published August 2, 2007

LONDON, Aug.1: British Airways has been fined £121.5 million by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) for illegally fixing fuel-surcharges levied on passengers booking long-haul flights with the airline.

According to a press release of the OFT issued here on Wednesday British Airways has admitted collusion over the price of ‘long-haul passenger fuel surcharges. The penalty will be the highest ever imposed by the OFT for infringements of competition law.

British Airways has admitted that between August 2004 and January 2006, it colluded with Virgin Atlantic over the surcharges which were added to ticket prices in response to rising oil prices. Over that period, the surcharges rose from £5 to £60 per ticket for a typical BA or Virgin Atlantic long-haul return flight.

Virgin Atlantic is not expected to pay any penalty as it qualifies in principle for full immunity under the OFT's leniency policy. Under this policy, a company which has been involved in cartel conduct and which is the first to give full details about it to the OFT will qualify for immunity from penalties in relation to that conduct.

British Airways has accepted the OFT’s finding that on at least six occasions the two companies discussed and/or informed each other about proposed changes to the level of the surcharges, rather than setting levels independently as required under clear and well-established competition law principles.

The OFT's investigation was conducted in parallel with a similar case brought by the United States Department of Justice (DoJ). The investigations by the OFT and DoJ were separate but the two agencies have consulted each other closely throughout.

The OFT's infringement decision against BA will be taken and published in due course. It will record the full findings in this case and the basis for the calculation of the penalty to be imposed on British Airways.

Fuel surcharges, when set independently, do not infringe competition law. Such surcharges were first introduced by each of BA and Virgin Airways in May 2004. The earliest evidence of collusion between the companies dates from August 2004.

The investigations by the OFT and the US Department of Justice centred on collusion between BA and Virgin Atlantic over the setting of fuel-surcharges in the past three years.

BA said the OFT and the Department of Justice in the US were continuing their respective criminal investigations into the conduct of certain individuals.

The airline suspended Martin George, its commercial director, and Iain Burns, head of communications, a year ago and both men later left the airline.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...