ISLAMABAD, July 22: More than 13,000 cases have piled up with the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) due to delay in the appointment of its new chairman.

The FST has remained non-functional since April 13, when the tenure of its then chairman Justice (retired) Chaudhary Mohammad Arif ended. While talking to Dawn, lawyers seemed pessimistic about the revival of the FST anytime soon.

“This is not the first time that the appointment of the new chairman is taking so long. At times it has taken from two months to as long as eight months. And this is denial of justice and the worst example of good governance,” said Pakistan Services Bar Association president Shoaib Shaheen, when approached on Sunday.

The FST chairman and its members are the two most important ingredients, he said, adding, “The court can function without a member but not in the absence of its head.”

Mr Shaheen also criticised the appointment of the chairmen on contract basis. “It is against independence of judiciary because there is no security of tenure. A chairman can be sacked anytime. Secondly, there is the element of inducement as extensions in tenure are only given when the government is happy with the chairman,” he said.

Some of the lawyers alleged that since the FST dealt mostly with cases against the state, it deliberately did not want the body to be independent.

“That’s why the chairman has very little powers. He even cannot issue a contempt notice to those who fail to execute his orders. For implementation the matter has to be taken to the Supreme Court,” a lawyer said.

The lawyers also criticised the improper criteria for appointing members of the FST.

The president of the Services Bar Association said out of the six members sitting on the three benches in Islamabad, two each in Lahore and Karachi, only one was qualified with a LLB degree.

“The rest are all retired bureaucrats with absolutely no knowledge of law and no judicial experiences. And there are ten times more cases pending with the FST than with the Federal Shariat Court. The government is deliberately trying to cripple the FST,” Mr Shaheen alleged.

The lawyers appealed to the chief justice of Pakistan to intervene, adding a chairman should not be appointed without his consultation because the FST was a judicial forum.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...