WASHINGTON, Feb 25: The Pentagon may scrap its new “strategic information” office based on concern over reports that the military might spread false information to foreign journalists and others to bolster U.S. policy, a defence official said on Monday.

Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has ordered the department to re-visit plans for the controversial Office of Strategic Information, formed two months after Sept. 11 attacks on America, Pentagon spokeswoman Victoria Clarke said.

“He has asked us to take a very hard look at it. And one of the questions, one of the issues raised was should it even exist,” she told reporters in response to questions.

Clarke said Undersecretary of Defence for Policy Douglas Feith was studying whether the new office should be disbanded in the wake of media reports that it might be used to spread false information among overseas reporters, civic leaders and others in both friendly and unfriendly countries.

Those reports last week sparked questions abroad and an uproar in Congress and elsewhere in the U.S. government.

Rumsfeld has since stressed that neither he nor the department had any intention of lying to anybody and that misinformation provided to enemy forces in battle should not be confused with normal, day-to-day public information efforts.

‘DISINFORMATION’ VIA EMAIL?: But defence officials told Reuters last week that the new office under Feith and headed by an Air Force general was considering spreading “disinformation” as well as true reports e-mailed to foreign journalists, government officials and civic leaders.

“The person who’s in charge is debating whether it should even exist in its current form, given all the misinformation and adverse publicity that it’s received,” Rumsfeld said on the NBC News programme “Meet the Press” on Sunday.

“I am always very, very concerned about our credibility,” added Clarke, who is assistant defence secretary in charge of the Pentagon’s public affairs office.

“I think it is very true that a lot of people were concerned,” she told reporters when asked about a Washington Post report that White House officials were angered when stories of the plan broke earlier last week as President George W. Bush was visiting Asia.

“Clearly there are lots of questions, and lots of issues, and lots of concerns,” Clarke said.

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer told reporters on Monday that Bush did not even hear about plans for the new office — which was formed in November — until he was in China last week.

“And I think it’s fair to say that the president would be troubled by any office that does not as a matter of public policy disseminate the truth and the facts,” Fleischer said.

“That’s what the president thinks government spokespeople and government public affairs officers — the government — must be dedicated to — dissemination of the truth, facts ...,” he added.—Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...