Lessons for Enron reformers

Published February 22, 2002

ST. LOUIS (USA): It seems almost inevitable that the widespread damage done to employees and investors by the Enron bankruptcy will produce a new wave of government regulation of business. The sheer magnitude of the disaster — as well as the reported shenanigans on the part of highly paid professionals who should have known better — virtually guarantees that Congress will respond with a host of new statutory requirements.

These circumstances warrant attention to ways that will help policy-makers write constructive laws and regulations. Some lessons from past efforts to regulate business would seem to be a useful starting point. For example, despite all the talk about “deregulation,” the fact is that the sheer magnitude, as well as complexity, of the existing array of regulation is awesome.

Anyone who has any doubts on that score should examine the many volumes of the Code of Federal Regulations. Better yet, just try to read one of the daily issues of the Federal Register. It is an eye opener to see the magnitude and variety of governmental regulations that are issued in a single day.

The most relevant “lesson” is that so often regulatory power is exercised in a manner that generates unexpected — and frequently counter-productive — results. A cogent case in point is the rise of the 401(k) “retirement” plans that are receiving much attention.

In the case of Enron, many culprits were involved, not the least of which was the well-intended ERISA (the Employees Retirement Income Security Act).

Congress enacted ERISA in 1974, after hearing dramatic cases of workers losing their pensions after many years of service. As would be expected, Congress responded by enacting a host of statutory “protections.”

Why make a point of that? Because back in 1974, most company- sponsored pensions were of the “defined benefit” variety, where the employer was on the hook to pay “defined” pensions to its retiring workers.

In retrospect, ERISA exemplified the old notion that “the best is the enemy of the good.” ERISA imposed so much paperwork and other costly burdens on employers, that thousands of pension plans were quickly terminated (about 10 per cent of existing plans). More important, over the years that followed, companies and other employers learned the benefits (at least to them) of getting out from under the burdens of ERISA altogether by shifting to “defined contribution” arrangements such as 401(k) plans.

Under this approach, the employer may set up a retirement plan, but it does not necessarily have to make a financial contribution (such as company stock). Employers using “defined contribution” plans are not responsible for the payment of any retirement benefits. Most company retirement plans are now of the “defined contribution” type and not subject to ERISA!

What should Congress do?

Before it starts to write new statutes, Congress should make sure existing laws are being fully enforced. Judging from widespread media reporting, at least some of the people involved in the Enron fiasco broke the law.

Heavy fines and long jail sentences, when the law calls for them, are a strong signal to the rest of us that the highly criticized conduct is not acceptable to society.

Subsequently, after making sure that the country needs some new laws, the Congress should — without the theatrics of recent weeks — sit down in quiet committee sessions and go about the serious business of writing new legislation.

Contrary to the standard treatment in the civics books, the actual process of writing laws does not get as much congressional attention as it deserves.

We also need to take into account the important changes that corporations and auditing firms are now making voluntarily so that they will not have to endure an Enron-like experience. For example, my personal forecast is that — whether or not Congress passes a law on the subject — it will be a very long time before any other company repeats the Enron blunder of hiring the same accounting firms to do both the internal audit and the external al audit.—Dawn/The Christian Science Monitor News Service

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...