ISLAMABAD, June 27: The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that employees of a majority of government corporations not governed by the statutory rules are not civil servants.

Such employees, therefore, cannot avail remedy from the Federal Services Tribunal to redress their grievances.

On January 20, a nine-member bench of the Supreme Court, while hearing 452 different cases, had reserved its judgment on whether teachers/employees of PAF educational institutes were civil servants under section 2(1-b) of the CSA, 1973, and whether they could invoke the jurisdiction of the FST. The judgement on the vires of section 2-A of the Service Tribunal Act had also been reserved.

Authored by Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, the 93-page judgment said that under section 2-A of the STA, the cases of the employees who did not fall within the definition of civil servants as defined in section 2(1-b) of the CSA would have no remedy before the service tribunal functioning under Article 212 (administrative courts and tribunals) of the Constitution and they were free to avail appropriate remedy.

Regarding the effect of the judgment on pending cases before the apex court and the FST, the order said the cases decided by the Supreme Court would not be opened and if any review petition, miscellaneous application or contempt application was pending against a judgment, it should be heard independently and should not be affected by the ratio of the judgment.

Likewise, proceedings instituted either by an employee or by the employer, pending before the supreme court, against the judgment of the service tribunal should stand abated, leaving the parties to avail remedy prevailing prior to promulgation of section 2-A of the STA, 1973.

The order said cases or proceedings not protected or covered by the judgment would also be deemed abated and the aggrieved persons might approach competent forums to redress their grievances within 90 days and the bar of limitation provided by respective laws should not operate against them till the expiry of the stipulated period.

It said the cases in which the order of the service tribunal had been implemented should remain intact for 90 days or till the filing of appropriate proceedings, which ever was earlier.

The FST would decide pending cases under section 2-A of the STA.

The bench noted that under section 2-A of the STA, the legislature had not declared the service of a person in a government controlled organization to be in the “service in connection with affairs of the federation.” Under Article 240 of the constitution, ‘service of Pakistan’ means “any service, post or office in connection with affairs of the federation.”

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...