THE recent events in Azad Kashmir are a powerful example of how dialogue can play a constructive role in effectively responding to public dissent. Days of peaceful yet resolute protests against the controversial ‘Peaceful Assembly and Public Order Ordinance, 2024’ compelled the AJK government to engage with the people, listen to their demands, and ultimately repeal the contentious law. Even after the AJK Supreme Court suspended the ordinance, protesters amplified their call for accountability and justice. Remarkably, despite sporadic unrest, the government refrained from heavy-handed crackdowns, allowing citizens to exercise their right to assemble. Protests were recently held in Islamabad, too, by the PTI. But the party’s march to the capital was met with an iron-fisted response. The protests were characterised by clashes with law enforcement, charges of excessive force against protesters and a wave of arrests. The tragic deaths of several security personnel and reports of PTI supporters killed highlight the human cost of a confrontational approach. Instead of fostering dialogue, the government — and the PTI — chose force. And the choice was made well before time, with the kind of over-preparedness on the part of the government witnessed in the lead-up to the events.

AJK’s approach, while not without flaws, shows us the importance of upholding democratic principles. The government’s decision to form a consultative committee, release detained activists, and meet public demands reflects a recognition of the wisdom in civic engagement. By addressing grievances, AJK defused tensions and reaffirmed faith in institutional processes. The political leadership must take a leaf out of AJK’s experience. Engaging with dissenting voices, rather than suppressing them, can pave the way for meaningful resolution. Protests are not just acts of defiance — they are opportunities for growth. Heavy-handed responses only stifle this potential and risk alienating an already disillusioned citizenry. The path to a united nation lies in dialogue, tolerance, and respect for the people’s voice.

Published in Dawn, December 10th, 2024