Grave concerns

Published July 21, 2024

PUNJAB Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz’s open assault on the Supreme Court for ruling in favour of the PTI in the reserved seats case came as a shock. Although neither her provincial government nor the federal government seems to be at any risk of losing power, Ms Nawaz on Friday appeared to accuse Supreme Court judges of trying to bring Imran Khan back to government by “rewriting” the Constitution. Addressing the superior judiciary, she said: “If a government has been installed […] you should let it run. We will not let this be easy for you. God willing, this government will complete five years. If someone tries to destabilise it or subvert it or create political instability, they will be dealt with iron hands.” As if this wasn’t enough, she implied that the judges of the apex court had “sold their consciences”. This attack seems to be part of the PML-N’s strategy to ‘go on the front foot’ against the Supreme Court and the PTI following the denial of a two-thirds majority in parliament. The ban announced on the PTI was part of this strategy, but it found few takers, including, it seems, from within the PML-N.

Is Plan ‘B’ meant to provoke the judiciary with open threats, even if the PML-N has no good reason to do so? It is true that both Ms Nawaz and her father, Nawaz Sharif, were once made to suffer several unfair decisions by the courts. One of those decisions had robbed Mr Sharif of his government. However, that was then. More recently, the Sharifs have been either the direct or indirect beneficiaries of a slew of important decisions made by the superior courts, and their ‘good fortune’ has seen all their legal worries melt away, almost by miracle. In short, the PML-N has had little to complain about till this particular judgement. Why, then, did Ms Nawaz choose to make herself vulnerable to contempt charges? The judiciary has, in recent months, grown increasingly protective of its independence — something that the PML-N itself was campaigning in favour of till last year. Amidst growing concerns about interference from state institutions, the judges are unlikely to view such comments favourably. Supreme Court decisions are, after all, binding under Article 189. Defiance is contempt. The PML-N should proceed with extreme caution.

Published in Dawn, July 21st, 2024

Opinion

One year on

One year on

Governance by the ruling coalition has been underwhelming and marked by growing authoritarianism.

Editorial

Climate funding gap
Updated 17 Feb, 2025

Climate funding gap

Pakistan must boost its institutional capacity to develop bankable climate projects.
UN monitoring report
Updated 17 Feb, 2025

UN monitoring report

Pakistan must press Kabul diplomatically over its tolerance of TTP terrorism.
Tax policy reform
17 Feb, 2025

Tax policy reform

THE cabinet’s decision to create a Tax Policy Office at the finance ministry has raised hopes that tax policy is...
Maintaining balance
Updated 16 Feb, 2025

Maintaining balance

It must take a more proactive approach to establishing Pakistan’s bona fides.
Welcome return
16 Feb, 2025

Welcome return

IT is almost here; the moment Pakistan has long been waiting for — the first International Cricket Council...
Childhood trauma
16 Feb, 2025

Childhood trauma

BEING a child in this society should not be so hard. But recurrent reports of child abuse — from burying girl...