ISLAMABAD: Two of the seven judges hearing the military courts case have opposed the July 8 order of the bench, impleading the Lahore High Court Bar Association (LHCBA) and the Lahore Bar Association (LBA) in the case, with one saying the matter at hand was purely a question of law.

Headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, a seven-judge bench had allowed the applications of the LHCBA and LBA by holding that there was no harm in accepting these applications, as senior counsels will assist the apex court in reaching a right conclusion while hearing the intra-court appeals (ICA) against the Oct 23, 2023 order.

The Oct 23 order by a five-member bench nullified the trial of civilians by the military courts involved in the May 9 violence.

But in separate notes, Justice Shahid Waheed and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan opposed the majority order.

In his note, Justice Shahid Waheed observed that the applicants had moved their applications under Order V Rule 2(2) read with Order 33 Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules 1980 for impleadment of the applicants as respondents in the ICAs preferred under Section 5(1) of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act 2023 against the Oct 23 judgement.

Justice Waheed explained that the grievance voiced in the ICA was that the lawfulness of Section 2(1)(d) and Section 59(4) of the Pakistan Army Act (PAA) 1952 had not been correctly determined by the original bench.

Section 2(1)(d)(i) of PAA says that those persons not otherwise subject to PAA become subject to it if they were accused of seducing or attempting to seduce any army officer from his duty or allegiance to the government.

Likewise, Section 2(1)(d)(ii) says the individuals could be tried under PAA if they have committed offence in relation to any work of defence, arsenal, naval, military or air force establishment or station, ship or aircraft or otherwise in relation to the naval, military or air force affairs of Pakistan an offence under the Official Secrets Act 1923.

Section 59(4) says that any person who becomes subject to PAA will be liable to be tried under this act.

The issue at hand, Justice Waheed observed, was a pure question of law and since PAA was a federal legislation, the question of its validity could be decided effectually and completely in the presence of the federation of Pakistan.

It needs to be examined whether the applicants, under the circumstances, can be allowed to join appeal proceedings to rendering assistance in the public interest, to determine the question of law raised before the court.

Meanwhile, Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan observed that the applicants were not aggrieved with the Oct 23 judgement, which was evident from the fact that they have shown their desire to be impleaded as respondents in the ICAs.

Published in Dawn, July 11th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Afghan challenge
Updated 15 Jul, 2024

Afghan challenge

Foreign states must emphasise to the Afghan Taliban diplomatic recognition and trade relations all depend on greater counterterrorism efforts.
‘Complete’ justice
15 Jul, 2024

‘Complete’ justice

NOW that the matter of PTI’s reserved seats stands resolved, there are several equally pressing issues pertaining...
Drug fog
15 Jul, 2024

Drug fog

THE country has an old drug problem. While the menace has raged across divides of class and gender, successive ...
Miles to go
Updated 14 Jul, 2024

Miles to go

Some reforms agreed with the Fund are going to seriously impact economic growth and fresh investments, at least in the short term.
Iddat ruling
14 Jul, 2024

Iddat ruling

IT was a needless, despicable spectacle which only ended up uniting both conservatives and progressives in ...
Cricket shake-up
14 Jul, 2024

Cricket shake-up

SOMEONE had to take the blame and bear the brunt of the fallout from Pakistan’s disastrous showing at the T20 ...