MOSCOW, March 2: Iran’s top nuclear negotiator accused the United States on Thursday of trying to ‘destroy’ Russian efforts to work out a solution for easing global worries over Tehran’s nuclear programme.

“The Americans’ insistence on referring the Iran nuclear dossier to the UN Security Council signifies the destruction of the Russian proposal,” Ali Larijani said at a news conference.

“I think the Americans are really an obstacle to the Russian plan.

“We think that, in ideal circumstances, the Russian proposition can be developed,” he said. “We are trying to take positive steps in order to successfully implement the Russian proposal.”

But even after Iran and Russia stated that they had held constructive negotiations, ‘the Americans announced that they were worried’.

“The Americans are lying when they say that Iran is pursuing the goal of creating nuclear weapons. This does not correspond to reality,” Mr Larijani said.

He was speaking a day after Iran and Russia failed to reach a breakthrough in high-stakes talks in Moscow on a Russian proposal aimed at resolving the impasse over Tehran’s nuclear programme, a plan centring on joint enrichment of uranium at a facility on Russian soil.

Mr Larijani described the negotiations, including discussion of Iran reinstating a voluntary moratorium on uranium enrichment work, as ‘very useful’ and said Moscow and Tehran were in agreement on a number of issues.

The Iranian negotiator however admitted that no date had been set for further consultations between Russia and Iran.

He also said Iranian officials planned to meet representatives of the European Union to discuss the issue before the UN nuclear supervisory agency meets on Monday to decide whether to take concerns over Iran’s nuclear intentions to the UN Security Council.

Mr Larijani said Russia and Iran had discussed a number of proposals which he said needed to be examined in a single package with a view to carrying out the Russian proposal for uranium enrichment and preserving Iran’s rights to develop civilian nuclear power.

“I would suggest that the Americans say one thing but in reality are putting a spanner in the works of the Russian proposal. Obviously it is not in the Americans’ interest that such a successful regional proposal should come from Russia,” he said.

Mr Larijani said Tehran would have no problem readmitting international inspectors to all of its nuclear facilities, provided the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and “influential states” within it, recognized Iran’s right to pursue a civilian nuclear energy program.

He said Iran and Russia were considering a package of new initiatives in connection with Russia’s proposal for joint uranium enrichment, but he declined to specify what these were.

“I think you’ll be hearing about them in the near future,” he said, adding: “For now, you’ll have to speculate.”

The Iran nuclear issue however should not be transferred to the UN Security Council because such a move would be ‘flawed’ and ‘not pretty’. —AFP

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...